Intel Core Ultra 9 386H vs Intel Core i7 11700F
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- Intel Core i7 11700F leads Intel Core Ultra 9 386H overall by 11 points (65 vs 54 out of 100).
Intel Core i7 11700F leads overall
Intel Core i7 11700F
65
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
54
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jun 2026.
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
AI analysis isn't ready yet
We haven't generated an in-depth write-up for Intel Core Ultra 9 386H yet. The specs, scores and strengths profile above still cover it — check back later for the AI summary.
Intel Core i7 11700F
This CPU is a mid-range processor designed for general computing tasks and light content creation. It utilizes an older 11th generation architecture, meaning it offers solid performance but may not benefit from the most modern platform features or efficiency gains.
Best for General ProductivityBest for Light Gaming
Pros
- Offers historical multi-core performance suitable for standard productivity workflows.
- Designed with a dedicated 'F' suffix implying inclusion of integrated graphics is not a feature.
Cons
- The 11th generation architecture is several generations old, limiting compatibility and efficiency compared to newer chips.
- While powerful, it lacks the modern core configurations (e.g., E-cores) found in more recent CPU lines.
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
Intel Core i7 11700F
Performance
Higher benchmark score = faster
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H44,000
Intel Core i7 11700F21,190
Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side