Intel Xeon W 3375 vs Intel Core i9 11900KF

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Intel Xeon W 3375 leads overall

Intel Xeon W 3375

Intel Core i9 11900KF

Why it stands out

Core Specifications Cores: 38
Core Specifications Threads: 76
Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 270 W

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jun 2026.

Intel Xeon W 3375

This document is a list documenting Intel Xeon microprocessors organized by generation. It details various models within different core-based architectures, including the 3000 series and 5000 series.

Best for Reference/ResearchBest for Comparison

Pros

The source provides an exhaustive chronological listing of numerous Xeon processors
Processors are categorized based on model lineages (e.g., E31x, X32x, X33x, E52xx)

Intel Core i9 11900KF

The Core i9 11900KF is a high-performance desktop CPU designed for demanding computing tasks. Its 'K' suffix indicates it can be overclocked, appealing to enthusiasts and power users who seek top-tier speed. It is built upon the 11th generation of Intel's product lineup.

Best for Content CreationBest for High-End GamingBest for Workstation Tasks

Pros

High core count capacity allows it to handle extensive multi-threaded workloads.
Being a high-end K-series chip suggests strong potential for customized performance boosts through overclocking.
The design belongs to the 11th generation, placing it in a widely available and supported CPU architecture.

Cons

As a non-integrated graphics model (indicated by 'KF'), the system requires a separate dedicated GPU.
High-end Core i9 chips are generally power-intensive and require substantial cooling solutions for sustained performance.

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Xeon W 3375

Check Price on Amazon

Intel Core i9 11900KF

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Xeon W 337556,403

Intel Core i9 11900KF25,389

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	Intel Xeon W 3375	Intel Core i9 11900KF
Cores	38	8
Threads	76	16
Base Frequency	2.5 GHz	3.5 GHz
Base Power Consumption	270 W	95 W
Maximum Frequency	4 GHz	5.3 GHz
Maximum Power Consumption	270 W	125 W
L1 Cache	3,040 KB	320 KB
L2 Cache	47.5 MB	2 MB
L3 Cache	57 MB	16 MB
Lithography Process	10 nm	14 nm
Is unlocked	No	Yes

Integrated Graphics

Feature	Intel Xeon W 3375	Intel Core i9 11900KF
Model	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	Intel Xeon W 3375	Intel Core i9 11900KF
PassMark CPU Mark	56,403	25,389

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Xeon W 3375 vs Intel Core i9 11900KF comparison

Based on our overall comparison score, Intel Xeon W 3375 rates higher at 72/100 versus 38/100 for Intel Core i9 11900KF — a 34-point lead. Intel Xeon W 3375 is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.

Intel Xeon W 3375 and Intel Core i9 11900KF are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 72/100 for Intel Xeon W 3375 and 38/100 for Intel Core i9 11900KF.

If you want the higher-rated cpus option overall, Intel Xeon W 3375 (72/100) edges out Intel Core i9 11900KF (38/100). But if Intel Core i9 11900KF is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.