Intel Xeon W 3375 vs Intel Core i9 13900F

Updated Jun 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the Intel Xeon W 3375 is the better pick — it scores 74/100 to the Intel Core i9 13900F's 66, leading on Benchmark. Choose the Intel Core i9 13900F instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Intel Xeon W 3375 leads overall

Intel Xeon W 3375

Intel Core i9 13900F

Why it stands out

Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 270 W (315% more)
Core Specifications L3 Cache: 57 MB (58% more)
Core Specifications Cores: 38

Winner by category for Intel Xeon W 3375 vs Intel Core i9 13900F
Category	Intel Xeon W 3375	Intel Core i9 13900F	Winner
Core Specifications	52	53	Tie
Integrated Graphics	0	0	Tie
Benchmark	84	73	Intel Xeon W 3375

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jun 2026.

Intel Xeon W 3375

This document is a list documenting Intel Xeon microprocessors organized by generation. It details various models within different core-based architectures, including the 3000 series and 5000 series.

Best for Reference/ResearchBest for Comparison

Pros

The source provides an exhaustive chronological listing of numerous Xeon processors
Processors are categorized based on model lineages (e.g., E31x, X32x, X33x, E52xx)

Intel Core i9 13900F

The Intel Core i9 13900F is part of the 13th generation Intel Core series of processors, which are grouped under the Raptor Lake microarchitecture [source: 1]. These CPUs are marketed for users seeking high performance across various computing tasks [source: 2].

Best for general productivityBest for high-performance computing

Pros

delivers unrivaled performance with the fastest chip built (referring to 13th Gen) [source: 2]

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Xeon W 3375

Check Price on Amazon

Intel Core i9 13900F

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Xeon W 337558,686

Intel Core i9 13900F48,029

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	Intel Xeon W 3375	Intel Core i9 13900F
Cores	38	24
Threads	76	32
Base Frequency	2.5 GHz25% more	2 GHz
Base Power Consumption	270 W315% more	65 W
Maximum Frequency	4 GHz	5.6 GHz40% more
Maximum Power Consumption	N/A	219 W
L1 Cache	3,040 KB40% more	2,176 KB
L2 Cache	47.5 MB48% more	32 MB
L3 Cache	57 MB58% more	36 MB
Lithography Process	10 nm	7 nm30% less
Is unlocked	No	No

Integrated Graphics

Feature	Intel Xeon W 3375	Intel Core i9 13900F
Model	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	Intel Xeon W 3375	Intel Core i9 13900F
PassMark CPU Mark	58,68622% more	48,029

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Xeon W 3375 vs Intel Core i9 13900F comparison

Based on our overall comparison score, Intel Xeon W 3375 rates higher at 85/100 versus 78/100 for Intel Core i9 13900F — a 7-point lead. Intel Xeon W 3375 is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.

Intel Xeon W 3375 and Intel Core i9 13900F are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 85/100 for Intel Xeon W 3375 and 78/100 for Intel Core i9 13900F.

If you want the higher-rated cpus option overall, Intel Xeon W 3375 (85/100) edges out Intel Core i9 13900F (78/100). But if Intel Core i9 13900F is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.