Vivo X300 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy M32
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy M32 overall by 41 points (85 vs 44 out of 100).
- Vivo X300 Pro stands out on Chip Model: MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Memory RAM capacity: 16 GB, Memory technology: UFS 4.1.
- Best value: Samsung Galaxy M32 (from $229) — the strongest score-per-dollar of the two.
Vivo X300 Pro leads overall
Vivo X300 Pro
85
Samsung Galaxy M32
44
Why it stands out
- Chip Model: MediaTek Dimensity 9500
- Memory RAM capacity: 16 GB
- Memory technology: UFS 4.1
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jul 2026.
Vivo X300 Pro
The Vivo X300 Pro is a flagship smartphone designed for power users who prioritize high-end mobile photography and robust battery life. It is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 9500 processor and features a brilliant 6.78-inch LTPO OLED display. With its heavy-duty zoom camera and robust water protection, it aims to compete at the very top of the premium market.
Best for High-detail zoom and close-up macro mobile photographyBest for Outdoor enthusiasts needing a highly water-resistant device with a very bright sBest for Power users wanting high-speed 90W wired charging paired with strong overall bat
Pros
- Highly advanced triple-lens camera setup featuring a 200 MP periscope telephoto sensor
- Generous 6510 mAh battery capacity on the global variant for extended multi-day use
- Superb outdoor visibility with a display that peaks at 4500 nits
- Dual IP68 and IP69 ratings offering protection against both immersion and high-pressure water jets
Cons
- Relatively heavy in the hand, weighing 226 grams
- European model gets a substantially smaller 5440 mAh battery compared to the global version
- Lacks support for expandable storage options
Samsung Galaxy M32
The Samsung Galaxy M32 is a smartphone announced in June 2021, featuring a display that refreshes at 90 Hertz. It provides a package of features intended for users seeking an affordable yet capable device. The phone supports dual nanoSIM cards and includes both USB Type-C and a dedicated headphone jack.
Best for budget buyersBest for media consumption
Pros
- Features a 6.4 inch Super AMOLED Full HD+ display with a 90Hz refresh rate
- The battery capacity is noted at up to 6000mAh
- Includes various ports such as USB type-c, a headphone jack, and storage expansion slot
- Has a side-mounted fingerprint scanner for quick unlocking
Cons
- Camera performance is stated to be beaten by certain rivals at a similar price point
- The plastic frame and glossy finish attract fingerprints easily
- Some users noted occasional stutter or slow app loading times while using the phone
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.
Vivo X300 Pro
Samsung Galaxy M32
Performance
Higher benchmark score = faster
Vivo X300 Pro3,583,003
Samsung Galaxy M32204,000
Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.
Battery capacity
Larger cell — a hardware spec, not battery life
Vivo X300 Pro6,510 mAh
Samsung Galaxy M325,000 mAh
Capacity is the raw battery size. Real-world battery life depends just as much on the processor, software and display.
Physical Comparison
Weigh them up, then compare real dimensions in 3D
Vivo X300 ProSamsung Galaxy M32
Vivo X300 Pro is 21 g (10%) heavier than Samsung Galaxy M32.
Review Videos
Hand-picked expert reviews for each product
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side