AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs AMD EPYC 72F3

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is the better pick — it scores 85/100 to the AMD EPYC 72F3's 52, leading on Benchmark. Choose the AMD EPYC 72F3 instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX leads overall

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

AMD EPYC 72F3

Why it stands out

Benchmark PassMark CPU Mark: 82,018 (201% more)
Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 280 W (56% more)
Core Specifications Cores: 64

Winner by category for AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs AMD EPYC 72F3
Category	AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX	AMD EPYC 72F3	Winner
Core Specifications	62	63	Tie
Integrated Graphics	0	0	Tie
Benchmark	96	46	AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

AMD Ryzen microprocessors are x86-64 CPUs based on the Zen microarchitecture. The Ryzen family includes various processor lines such as Ryzen 3, Ryzen 5, and Ryzen Threadripper, which can feature up to 96 cores. Desktop processors include different generations like the Ryzen 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, etc., series.

Best for N/A

Pros

Cons

AMD EPYC 72F3

The AMD EPYC 72F3 is an enterprise server processor featuring 8 cores and 16 threads designed for high-frequency, cache-sensitive server workloads. Built on a 7nm manufacturing process, it delivers a high base clock speed of 3.7 GHz and a boost up to 4.1 GHz, paired with an unusually large 512 MB L3 cache. It is primarily built for environments where per-core software licensing fees make high individual core performance more critical than total core density.

Best for Database systems and applications constrained by per-core licensing feesBest for High-frequency server workloads that benefit heavily from massive L3 cache capac

Pros

Massive 512 MB L3 cache providing high data throughput for cache-sensitive tasks
High base clock speed of 3.7 GHz for strong single-threaded and per-core performance

Cons

High baseline power consumption of 165 W (up to 200 W) for an 8-core processor
Lower overall parallel compute throughput compared to high-core-count server CPUs

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Check Price on Amazon

AMD EPYC 72F3

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX82,018

AMD EPYC 72F327,252

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX	AMD EPYC 72F3
Cores	64	8
Threads	128	16
Base Frequency	2.7 GHz	3.7 GHz37% more
Base Power Consumption	280 W56% more	180 W
Maximum Frequency	4.2 GHz	4.1 GHz
Maximum Power Consumption	N/A	200 W
L1 Cache	4,096 KB	N/A
L2 Cache	32 MB	N/A
L3 Cache	256 MB	256 MB
Lithography Process	7 nm	7 nm
Is unlocked	No	N/A

Integrated Graphics

Feature	AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX	AMD EPYC 72F3
Model	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX	AMD EPYC 72F3
PassMark CPU Mark	82,018201% more	27,252

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs AMD EPYC 72F3 comparison

Based on our overall comparison score, AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX rates higher at 91/100 versus 61/100 for AMD EPYC 72F3 — a 30-point lead. AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX and AMD EPYC 72F3 are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 91/100 for AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX and 61/100 for AMD EPYC 72F3.

If you want the higher-rated cpus option overall, AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX (91/100) edges out AMD EPYC 72F3 (61/100). But if AMD EPYC 72F3 is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.