AMD EPYC 7313 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the AMD EPYC 7313 is the better pick — it scores 68/100 to the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX's 59, leading on Core Specifications. Choose the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • AMD EPYC 7313 leads AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX overall by 9 points (68 vs 59 out of 100).
  • AMD EPYC 7313 stands out on Core Specifications L3 Cache: 128 MB (100% more).
AMD EPYC 7313 leads overall
AMD EPYC 7313
68
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
59
Why it stands out
  • Core Specifications L3 Cache: 128 MB (100% more)

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

AMD EPYC 7313

The AMD EPYC 7313 is a server-grade processor built on a 7nm manufacturing process, featuring 16 cores and 32 threads. Launched in early 2021, it operates at a 3.0 GHz base clock speed with boost capability up to 3.7 GHz alongside 128 MB of L3 cache. It is designed for enterprise server hardware and virtualized data center infrastructure.

Best for Enterprise server applications benefiting from high cache capacity and 32 parallBest for Data center virtualization requiring efficient multi-core processing within a 15
Pros
  • Generous 128 MB L3 cache aids memory-intensive enterprise tasks
  • Strong multi-threaded efficiency with 16 cores and 32 threads
  • Moderate power consumption capped at a 180W maximum rating
Cons
  • Lacks integrated graphics, requiring dedicated server management or discrete GPU hardware
  • Multiplier is locked, preventing manual frequency adjustment

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is a professional workstation processor built on a 7nm manufacturing process, featuring 16 cores and 32 threads. Designed for the sWRX8 platform, it operates at a base clock frequency of 3.9 GHz with a max boost frequency of 4.3 GHz. It is targeted at workstation users requiring enterprise-grade compute power and high multi-threaded performance.

Best for Heavy multi-threaded workstation applications on the sWRX8 platformBest for Professional compute tasks requiring high base clock speeds across 16 cores
Pros
  • High core density with 16 cores and 32 threads for intensive parallel workloads
  • Solid 3.9 GHz base frequency alongside a 4.3 GHz maximum boost frequency
  • Generous 64 MB L3 cache to support data-heavy processing
Cons
  • Substantial power consumption with a 280 W rating
  • Lacks integrated graphics, requiring a dedicated graphics card
  • Locked multiplier prevents manual processor overclocking

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

AMD EPYC 731339,725
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX39,788

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AMD EPYC 7313 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX comparison

They are closely matched: AMD EPYC 7313 scores 72/100 and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX scores 71/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 point. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
AMD EPYC 7313 and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 72/100 for AMD EPYC 7313 and 71/100 for AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX.
It's close — AMD EPYC 7313 (72/100) and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX (71/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote