AMD EPYC 7313 vs Apple M6

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the AMD EPYC 7313 is the better pick — it scores 75/100 to the Apple M6's 65, leading on Core Specifications and Benchmark. Choose the Apple M6 instead if integrated graphics matters most to you, where it comes out ahead.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

AMD EPYC 7313 leads overall

AMD EPYC 7313

Apple M6

Why it stands out

Core Specifications Cores: 16
Core Specifications Threads: 32
Benchmark PassMark CPU Mark: 39,725 (11% more)

Winner by category for AMD EPYC 7313 vs Apple M6
Category	AMD EPYC 7313	Apple M6	Winner
Core Specifications	85	68	AMD EPYC 7313
Integrated Graphics	0	55	Apple M6
Benchmark	70	64	AMD EPYC 7313

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

AMD EPYC 7313

The AMD EPYC 7313 is a server-grade processor built on a 7nm manufacturing process, featuring 16 cores and 32 threads. Launched in early 2021, it operates at a 3.0 GHz base clock speed with boost capability up to 3.7 GHz alongside 128 MB of L3 cache. It is designed for enterprise server hardware and virtualized data center infrastructure.

Best for Enterprise server applications benefiting from high cache capacity and 32 parallBest for Data center virtualization requiring efficient multi-core processing within a 15

Pros

Generous 128 MB L3 cache aids memory-intensive enterprise tasks
Strong multi-threaded efficiency with 16 cores and 32 threads
Moderate power consumption capped at a 180W maximum rating

Cons

Lacks integrated graphics, requiring dedicated server management or discrete GPU hardware
Multiplier is locked, preventing manual frequency adjustment

Apple M6

The Apple M6 is an ARM-based system-on-a-chip manufactured using TSMC's 2 nm process, designed for entry-level Mac desktops and laptops. It features a 12-core CPU architecture alongside a 12-core GPU and a dual 16-core Neural Engine. Capable of supporting up to 32 GB of unified memory with bandwidth reaching 170 GB/s, it caters to mainstream consumers and everyday creative workloads.

Best for Accelerated on-device machine learning and AI workload executionBest for Mainstream video editing utilizing hardware ProRes and AV1 decodingBest for Multi-display desktop setups running high-refresh-rate 4K monitors

Pros

Built on an advanced 2 nm fabrication node for higher efficiency and transistor density
Dual 16-core Neural Engine delivers significantly higher compute performance for on-device AI tasks
Upgraded GPU architecture includes dynamic caching and hardware-accelerated ray tracing
Expanded display engine supports two external 4K monitors at up to 165 Hz

Cons

No high-end M6 Pro or M6 Max variants are offered in this chip generation
Higher entry price point for associated Mac hardware compared to previous iterations

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

AMD EPYC 7313

Check Price on Amazon

Apple M6

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

AMD EPYC 731339,725

Apple M635,823

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	AMD EPYC 7313	Apple M6
Cores	16	12
Threads	32	12
Base Frequency	3 GHz	N/A
Base Power Consumption	155 W	N/A
Maximum Frequency	3.7 GHz	N/A
Maximum Power Consumption	180 W	N/A
L1 Cache	1,024 KB	N/A
L2 Cache	8 MB	N/A
L3 Cache	128 MB	N/A
Lithography Process	7 nm	2 nm71% less
Is unlocked	N/A	No

Integrated Graphics

Feature	AMD EPYC 7313	Apple M6
Model	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	AMD EPYC 7313	Apple M6
PassMark CPU Mark	39,72511% more	35,823

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AMD EPYC 7313 vs Apple M6 comparison

They are closely matched: AMD EPYC 7313 scores 72/100 and Apple M6 scores 71/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 point. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.

AMD EPYC 7313 and Apple M6 are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 72/100 for AMD EPYC 7313 and 71/100 for Apple M6.

It's close — AMD EPYC 7313 (72/100) and Apple M6 (71/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.