AMD EPYC 7313P vs Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core

Updated Sep 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the AMD EPYC 7313P is the better pick — it scores 79/100 to the Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core's 73, leading on Core Specifications. Choose the Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core instead if integrated graphics matters most to you, where it comes out ahead.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • AMD EPYC 7313P leads Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core overall by 6 points (79 vs 73 out of 100).
  • AMD EPYC 7313P stands out on Core Specifications Threads: 32.
AMD EPYC 7313P leads overall
AMD EPYC 7313P
79
Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core
73
Why it stands out
  • Core Specifications Threads: 32

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Sep 2026.

AMD EPYC 7313P

The AMD EPYC 7313P is a 16-core server-class processor built on a 7nm lithography process, designed primarily for single-socket server deployments. Running with 32 threads and a base clock speed of 3.0 GHz, this CPU is engineered to handle enterprise-level multi-threaded applications and virtualization tasks.

Best for Single-socket server environments running dense virtual machines or…Best for Data-heavy server applications that require significant cache capacity to…
Pros
  • Generous 128 MB of L3 cache to help accelerate memory-intensive data access
  • Strong multi-threaded capacity with 16 cores and 32 threads for parallel computing
  • Relatively efficient power envelope with a 155-watt base power consumption on a 7nm process
Cons
  • Does not feature integrated graphics, necessitating dedicated display output hardware
  • Locked multiplier prevents manual frequency adjustments or overclocking

Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core

The Apple M1 Ultra is an extremely powerful System-on-a-Chip designed for high-end, professional workstations. It combines two independently connected M1 Max units via the 'UltraFusion' interconnect to significantly increase computational throughput. This processor is suited for users who require maximum performance for intensive creative and scientific workloads.

Best for Professional video editingBest for 3D Rendering/VFXBest for Computational modeling
Pros
  • High core count structure, featuring a total of 20 CPU cores and dedicated high-bandwidth interconnectivity (Source 1)
  • Significant memory capacity options are available, supporting up to 128 GB of LPDDR5 RAM (Source 1)
  • Achieves exceptional performance by combining two M1 Max units, effectively doubling peak capabilities (Source 1)
Cons
  • The high resource requirements make it unsuitable for most general-purpose computing tasks
  • It is a discontinued processor, limiting modern upgrade paths and support options (Source 1)

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

AMD EPYC 7313P

Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

AMD EPYC 7313P40,325
Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core41,396

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AMD EPYC 7313P vs Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core comparison

They are closely matched: AMD EPYC 7313P scores 72/100 and Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core scores 72/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 points. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
AMD EPYC 7313P and Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 72/100 for AMD EPYC 7313P and 72/100 for Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core.
It's close — AMD EPYC 7313P (72/100) and Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core (72/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote