AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs AMD EPYC 7343

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is the better pick — it scores 83/100 to the AMD EPYC 7343's 58, leading on Core Specifications and Benchmark. Choose the AMD EPYC 7343 instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX leads AMD EPYC 7343 overall by 25 points (83 vs 58 out of 100).
  • AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX stands out on Core Specifications L1 Cache: 4,096 KB (100% more), Core Specifications L2 Cache: 32 MB (300% more), Core Specifications L3 Cache: 256 MB (100% more).
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX leads overall
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
83
AMD EPYC 7343
58
Why it stands out
  • Core Specifications L1 Cache: 4,096 KB (100% more)
  • Core Specifications L2 Cache: 32 MB (300% more)
  • Core Specifications L3 Cache: 256 MB (100% more)

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

AMD Ryzen microprocessors are x86-64 CPUs based on the Zen microarchitecture. The Ryzen family includes various processor lines such as Ryzen 3, Ryzen 5, and Ryzen Threadripper, which can feature up to 96 cores. Desktop processors include different generations like the Ryzen 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, etc., series.

Best for N/A
Pros
  • N/A
Cons
  • N/A

AMD EPYC 7343

The AMD EPYC 7343 is a 16-core, 32-thread server processor designed for data centers and enterprise server deployments. Built on a 7nm lithography process, it features a base frequency of 3.2 GHz with a boost clock of up to 3.9 GHz and includes 128 MB of L3 cache. It targets mid-density server workloads that benefit from high per-core clock speeds combined with robust multi-threading.

Best for Enterprise virtualization servers requiring high core clock speedsBest for Data center workloads that depend heavily on large pool memory caches
Pros
  • High 3.2 GHz base clock speed for clock-sensitive server applications
  • Generous 128 MB L3 cache to assist memory-bound server workloads
  • Solid multi-threaded execution with 16 cores and 32 threads
Cons
  • High baseline power consumption of 165 W reaching up to 200 W under max load
  • Lacks integrated graphics processing

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX82,018
AMD EPYC 734343,778

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs AMD EPYC 7343 comparison

Based on our overall comparison score, AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX rates higher at 91/100 versus 75/100 for AMD EPYC 7343 — a 16-point lead. AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX and AMD EPYC 7343 are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 91/100 for AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX and 75/100 for AMD EPYC 7343.
If you want the higher-rated cpus option overall, AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX (91/100) edges out AMD EPYC 7343 (75/100). But if AMD EPYC 7343 is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote