AMD EPYC 7713 vs AMD EPYC 73F3

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the AMD EPYC 7713 is the better pick — it scores 81/100 to the AMD EPYC 73F3's 58, leading on Core Specifications and Benchmark. Choose the AMD EPYC 73F3 instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

AMD EPYC 7713 leads overall

AMD EPYC 7713

AMD EPYC 73F3

Why it stands out

Core Specifications L1 Cache: 4,096 KB (300% more)
Core Specifications L2 Cache: 32 MB (300% more)
Benchmark PassMark CPU Mark: 83,066 (80% more)

Winner by category for AMD EPYC 7713 vs AMD EPYC 73F3
Category	AMD EPYC 7713	AMD EPYC 73F3	Winner
Core Specifications	60	40	AMD EPYC 7713
Integrated Graphics	0	0	Tie
Benchmark	92	67	AMD EPYC 7713

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

AMD EPYC 7713

The AMD EPYC 7713 is a 64-core, 128-thread server processor built on a 7nm manufacturing process and designed for high-density enterprise environments. It operates at a base clock frequency of 2.0 GHz with boost speeds reaching up to 3.7 GHz. Equipped with a massive 512 MB L3 cache and a 225W base TDP, it targets demanding server workloads requiring extensive parallel processing capabilities.

Best for High-density server virtualization and cloud infrastructure deploymentsBest for Massively multi-threaded enterprise workloads and scientific computing

Pros

High compute density featuring 64 cores and 128 threads
Generous 512 MB L3 cache to aid data-heavy server applications
Manageable 225W base power consumption given the high core count

Cons

Modest 2.0 GHz base frequency compared to processors with fewer cores
Requires discrete graphics or IPMI server management as it lacks integrated graphics
Locked multiplier prevents any manual frequency tuning

AMD EPYC 73F3

The AMD EPYC 73F3 is a high-frequency server processor released in 2021, built on a 7nm manufacturing process with 16 cores and 32 threads. It operates at a fast base clock frequency of 3.5 GHz with a maximum boost frequency of 4.0 GHz, supported by a large 256 MB L3 cache. Intended for enterprise data center environments, it operates at a base power level of 225W with a maximum power draw of 240W.

Best for Enterprise server applications needing high per-core performance and low cache lBest for Data center deployments requiring high-frequency 16-core processing power

Pros

High 3.5 GHz base clock speed and up to 4.0 GHz boost for strong per-thread performance
Large 256 MB L3 cache reduces memory access latency for cached-sensitive tasks
16 cores and 32 threads provide solid multi-threaded enterprise computing capabilities

Cons

High 225W to 240W power consumption requires substantial server cooling infrastructure
Lacks integrated graphics capability
Locked multiplier prevents manual frequency adjustments

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

AMD EPYC 7713

Check Price on Amazon

AMD EPYC 73F3

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

AMD EPYC 771383,066

AMD EPYC 73F346,103

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	AMD EPYC 7713	AMD EPYC 73F3
Cores	64	16
Threads	128	32
Base Frequency	2 GHz	3.5 GHz75% more
Base Power Consumption	225 W	240 W7% more
Maximum Frequency	3.7 GHz	4 GHz8% more
Maximum Power Consumption	240 W	240 W
L1 Cache	4,096 KB300% more	1,024 KB
L2 Cache	32 MB300% more	8 MB
L3 Cache	256 MB	256 MB
Lithography Process	7 nm	7 nm
Is unlocked	N/A	N/A

Integrated Graphics

Feature	AMD EPYC 7713	AMD EPYC 73F3
Model	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	AMD EPYC 7713	AMD EPYC 73F3
PassMark CPU Mark	83,06680% more	46,103

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AMD EPYC 7713 vs AMD EPYC 73F3 comparison

Based on our overall comparison score, AMD EPYC 7713 rates higher at 90/100 versus 76/100 for AMD EPYC 73F3 — a 14-point lead. AMD EPYC 7713 is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.

AMD EPYC 7713 and AMD EPYC 73F3 are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 90/100 for AMD EPYC 7713 and 76/100 for AMD EPYC 73F3.

If you want the higher-rated cpus option overall, AMD EPYC 7713 (90/100) edges out AMD EPYC 73F3 (76/100). But if AMD EPYC 73F3 is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.