Intel Xeon W 3375 vs AMD EPYC 7413

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

The Intel Xeon W 3375 and AMD EPYC 7413 are closely matched at 71 and 70/100. The Intel Xeon W 3375 edges ahead on Benchmark, while the AMD EPYC 7413 leads on Core Specifications — pick the one whose strengths match what you'll actually use.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Intel Xeon W 3375 and AMD EPYC 7413 are closely matched

Intel Xeon W 3375

AMD EPYC 7413

Where Intel Xeon W 3375 stands out

Core Specifications L2 Cache: 47.5 MB (296% more)
Core Specifications L1 Cache: 3,040 KB (98% more)
Core Specifications Cores: 38

Where AMD EPYC 7413 stands out

Core Specifications L3 Cache: 128 MB (125% more)
Core Specifications Lithography Process: 7 nm (30% less)
Core Specifications Base Frequency: 2.7 GHz (8% more)

Winner by category for Intel Xeon W 3375 vs AMD EPYC 7413
Category	Intel Xeon W 3375	AMD EPYC 7413	Winner
Core Specifications	46	61	AMD EPYC 7413
Integrated Graphics	0	0	Tie
Benchmark	84	75	Intel Xeon W 3375

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

Intel Xeon W 3375

This document is a list documenting Intel Xeon microprocessors organized by generation. It details various models within different core-based architectures, including the 3000 series and 5000 series.

Best for Reference/ResearchBest for Comparison

Pros

The source provides an exhaustive chronological listing of numerous Xeon processors
Processors are categorized based on model lineages (e.g., E31x, X32x, X33x, E52xx)

AMD EPYC 7413

The AMD EPYC 7413 is a 24-core, 48-thread server processor designed for enterprise data centers and multi-tenant cloud environments. Built on a 7nm manufacturing process, it features a 2.7 GHz base clock speed, a maximum boost frequency of 3.6 GHz, and a substantial 128 MB L3 cache. Operating at a default power envelope of 165W, it delivers strong multi-core performance for virtualized workloads and server applications.

Best for Enterprise server virtualization requiring dense multi-threading capabilityBest for Data center operations seeking balanced multi-core compute efficiency within a 1

Pros

High thread capacity with 24 cores and 48 threads for parallel server workloads
Generous 128 MB L3 cache helps reduce memory latency in data-intensive tasks
Manageable 165W base power rating with a maximum cap of 200W

Cons

Lacks integrated graphics capability
Locked multiplier prevents manually adjusting clock ratios
Lower single-core base frequency of 2.7 GHz relative to desktop-grade processors

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Xeon W 3375

Check Price on Amazon

AMD EPYC 7413

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Xeon W 337558,686

AMD EPYC 741350,641

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	Intel Xeon W 3375	AMD EPYC 7413
Cores	38	24
Threads	76	48
Base Frequency	2.5 GHz	2.7 GHz8% more
Base Power Consumption	270 W50% more	180 W
Maximum Frequency	4 GHz11% more	3.6 GHz
Maximum Power Consumption	N/A	200 W
L1 Cache	3,040 KB98% more	1,536 KB
L2 Cache	47.5 MB296% more	12 MB
L3 Cache	57 MB	128 MB125% more
Lithography Process	10 nm	7 nm30% less
Is unlocked	No	N/A

Integrated Graphics

Feature	Intel Xeon W 3375	AMD EPYC 7413
Model	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	Intel Xeon W 3375	AMD EPYC 7413
PassMark CPU Mark	58,68616% more	50,641

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Xeon W 3375 vs AMD EPYC 7413 comparison

Based on our overall comparison score, Intel Xeon W 3375 rates higher at 85/100 versus 80/100 for AMD EPYC 7413 — a 5-point lead. Intel Xeon W 3375 is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.

Intel Xeon W 3375 and AMD EPYC 7413 are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 85/100 for Intel Xeon W 3375 and 80/100 for AMD EPYC 7413.

If you want the higher-rated cpus option overall, Intel Xeon W 3375 (85/100) edges out AMD EPYC 7413 (80/100). But if AMD EPYC 7413 is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.