Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs AMD EPYC 7443P

Updated Sep 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is the better pick — it scores 75/100 to the AMD EPYC 7443P's 70, leading on Core Specifications and Integrated Graphics. Choose the AMD EPYC 7443P instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K leads overall

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

AMD EPYC 7443P

Why it stands out

Core Specifications L2 Cache: 40 MB (233% more)
Core Specifications L1 Cache: 2,432 KB (58% more)
Core Specifications Maximum Frequency: 5.7 GHz (43% more)

Winner by category for Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs AMD EPYC 7443P
Category	Intel Core Ultra 9 285K	AMD EPYC 7443P	Winner
Core Specifications	59	52	Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Integrated Graphics	44	0	Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Benchmark	87	79	Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Sep 2026.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is a high-performance microprocessor utilizing the Arrow Lake microarchitecture. This type of processor, which debuted in 2024, is engineered for demanding desktop computing tasks. It is best suited for power users and enthusiasts requiring exceptional computational capability.

Best for high-performance tasksBest for content creationBest for intensive gaming

Pros

Designed on the modern Arrow Lake architecture (Source 1)
Represents a powerful step in Intel’s Core series development (Source 2)
Targeted as a desktop processor for high-end performance computing (Inferred from product type and general knowledge)

Cons

Requires specific system compatibility to leverage its modern microarchitecture (General PC knowledge)
The product is associated with the Arrow Lake platform, indicating it belongs to Intel's current generation offerings (Source 1)

AMD EPYC 7443P

The AMD EPYC 7443P is a server-grade processor featuring 24 cores and 48 threads, designed primarily for single-socket enterprise infrastructure. It operates at a 2.9 GHz base frequency and features 128 MB of L3 cache to handle highly parallel server workloads and virtualization tasks.

Best for Single-socket server installations and virtualization environmentsBest for Data-intensive workloads that benefit from a large L3 cache hierarchy

Pros

Excellent multithreaded performance with 24 physical cores and 48 threads
Generous 128 MB L3 cache reduces memory access bottlenecks
Max boost frequency reaches up to 4.0 GHz for responsive peak performance

Cons

Lacks integrated graphics, requiring motherboard-level display capabilities or a discrete graphics card
Power consumption can reach up to 200 watts under maximum load
Locked multiplier prevents manual overclocking of the CPU

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

Check Price on Amazon

AMD EPYC 7443P

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K67,232

AMD EPYC 7443P56,984

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	Intel Core Ultra 9 285K	AMD EPYC 7443P
Cores	24	24
Threads	24	48
Base Frequency	3.7 GHz28% more	2.9 GHz
Base Power Consumption	125 W	200 W60% more
Maximum Frequency	5.7 GHz43% more	4 GHz
Maximum Power Consumption	250 W25% more	200 W
L1 Cache	2,432 KB58% more	1,536 KB
L2 Cache	40 MB233% more	12 MB
L3 Cache	36 MB	128 MB256% more
Lithography Process	3 nm	N/A
Is unlocked	Yes	N/A

Integrated Graphics

Feature	Intel Core Ultra 9 285K	AMD EPYC 7443P
Model		N/A

Benchmark

Feature	Intel Core Ultra 9 285K	AMD EPYC 7443P
PassMark CPU Mark	67,23218% more	56,984

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs AMD EPYC 7443P comparison

They are closely matched: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K scores 84/100 and AMD EPYC 7443P scores 83/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 point. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and AMD EPYC 7443P are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 84/100 for Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and 83/100 for AMD EPYC 7443P.

It's close — Intel Core Ultra 9 285K (84/100) and AMD EPYC 7443P (83/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.