Intel Xeon W 3375 vs AMD EPYC 7443P

Updated Sep 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

The Intel Xeon W 3375 and AMD EPYC 7443P are closely matched at 74 and 74/100. The Intel Xeon W 3375 edges ahead, while the AMD EPYC 7443P leads on value — pick the one whose strengths match what you'll actually use.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Intel Xeon W 3375 and AMD EPYC 7443P are closely matched

Intel Xeon W 3375

AMD EPYC 7443P

Where Intel Xeon W 3375 stands out

Core Specifications L2 Cache: 47.5 MB (296% more)
Core Specifications L1 Cache: 3,040 KB (98% more)
Core Specifications Cores: 38

Where AMD EPYC 7443P stands out

Core Specifications L3 Cache: 128 MB (125% more)
Core Specifications Base Frequency: 2.9 GHz (16% more)

Winner by category for Intel Xeon W 3375 vs AMD EPYC 7443P
Category	Intel Xeon W 3375	AMD EPYC 7443P	Winner
Core Specifications	58	60	Tie
Integrated Graphics	0	0	Tie
Benchmark	82	80	Tie

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Sep 2026.

Intel Xeon W 3375

This document is a list documenting Intel Xeon microprocessors organized by generation. It details various models within different core-based architectures, including the 3000 series and 5000 series.

Best for Reference/ResearchBest for Comparison

Pros

The source provides an exhaustive chronological listing of numerous Xeon processors
Processors are categorized based on model lineages (e.g., E31x, X32x, X33x, E52xx)

AMD EPYC 7443P

The AMD EPYC 7443P is a server-grade processor featuring 24 cores and 48 threads, designed primarily for single-socket enterprise infrastructure. It operates at a 2.9 GHz base frequency and features 128 MB of L3 cache to handle highly parallel server workloads and virtualization tasks.

Best for Single-socket server installations and virtualization environmentsBest for Data-intensive workloads that benefit from a large L3 cache hierarchy

Pros

Excellent multithreaded performance with 24 physical cores and 48 threads
Generous 128 MB L3 cache reduces memory access bottlenecks
Max boost frequency reaches up to 4.0 GHz for responsive peak performance

Cons

Lacks integrated graphics, requiring motherboard-level display capabilities or a discrete graphics card
Power consumption can reach up to 200 watts under maximum load
Locked multiplier prevents manual overclocking of the CPU

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Xeon W 3375

Check Price on Amazon

AMD EPYC 7443P

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Xeon W 337558,686

AMD EPYC 7443P56,984

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	Intel Xeon W 3375	AMD EPYC 7443P
Cores	38	24
Threads	76	48
Base Frequency	2.5 GHz	2.9 GHz16% more
Base Power Consumption	270 W35% more	200 W
Maximum Frequency	4 GHz	4 GHz
Maximum Power Consumption	N/A	200 W
L1 Cache	3,040 KB98% more	1,536 KB
L2 Cache	47.5 MB296% more	12 MB
L3 Cache	57 MB	128 MB125% more
Lithography Process	10 nm	N/A
Is unlocked	No	N/A

Integrated Graphics

Feature	Intel Xeon W 3375	AMD EPYC 7443P
Model	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	Intel Xeon W 3375	AMD EPYC 7443P
PassMark CPU Mark	58,6863% more	56,984

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Xeon W 3375 vs AMD EPYC 7443P comparison

They are closely matched: Intel Xeon W 3375 scores 85/100 and AMD EPYC 7443P scores 83/100 in our overall comparison — within 2 points. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.

Intel Xeon W 3375 and AMD EPYC 7443P are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 85/100 for Intel Xeon W 3375 and 83/100 for AMD EPYC 7443P.

It's close — Intel Xeon W 3375 (85/100) and AMD EPYC 7443P (83/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.