AMD EPYC 7713 vs AMD EPYC 74F3

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the AMD EPYC 7713 is the better pick — it scores 81/100 to the AMD EPYC 74F3's 69, leading on Core Specifications and Benchmark. Choose the AMD EPYC 74F3 instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

AMD EPYC 7713 leads overall

AMD EPYC 7713

AMD EPYC 74F3

Why it stands out

Core Specifications Cores: 64
Core Specifications Threads: 128
Benchmark PassMark CPU Mark: 83,066 (37% more)

Winner by category for AMD EPYC 7713 vs AMD EPYC 74F3
Category	AMD EPYC 7713	AMD EPYC 74F3	Winner
Core Specifications	63	49	AMD EPYC 7713
Integrated Graphics	0	0	Tie
Benchmark	89	79	AMD EPYC 7713

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

AMD EPYC 7713

The AMD EPYC 7713 is a 64-core, 128-thread server processor built on a 7nm manufacturing process and designed for high-density enterprise environments. It operates at a base clock frequency of 2.0 GHz with boost speeds reaching up to 3.7 GHz. Equipped with a massive 512 MB L3 cache and a 225W base TDP, it targets demanding server workloads requiring extensive parallel processing capabilities.

Best for High-density server virtualization and cloud infrastructure deploymentsBest for Massively multi-threaded enterprise workloads and scientific computing

Pros

High compute density featuring 64 cores and 128 threads
Generous 512 MB L3 cache to aid data-heavy server applications
Manageable 225W base power consumption given the high core count

Cons

Modest 2.0 GHz base frequency compared to processors with fewer cores
Requires discrete graphics or IPMI server management as it lacks integrated graphics
Locked multiplier prevents any manual frequency tuning

AMD EPYC 74F3

The AMD EPYC 74F3 is a server and workstation-class processor featuring 24 cores and 48 threads built on a 7nm process. Released in early 2021, it delivers base clock speeds of 3.2 GHz with boost frequencies reaching up to 4.0 GHz alongside a massive 256 MB L3 cache. It is designed for enterprise and workstation environments that demand high frequency per core and significant cache availability for compute-heavy applications.

Best for High-performance workstation tasks that require strong single-thread boost clockBest for Enterprise multithreaded server workloads benefiting from steady 24-core paralle

Pros

High peak clock speeds up to 4.0 GHz alongside a steady 3.2 GHz base frequency
Large 256 MB L3 cache buffer to optimize data-intensive and latency-sensitive tasks
Strong multithreaded performance output with 24 cores and 48 threads

Cons

High 240W thermal design power (TDP) demands robust enterprise cooling solutions
No integrated graphics processor, requiring a discrete GPU for display output
Locked multiplier prevents manual clock speed adjustment

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

AMD EPYC 7713

Check Price on Amazon

AMD EPYC 74F3

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

AMD EPYC 771383,066

AMD EPYC 74F360,666

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	AMD EPYC 7713	AMD EPYC 74F3
Cores	64	24
Threads	128	48
Base Frequency	2 GHz	3.2 GHz60% more
Base Power Consumption	225 W	240 W7% more
Maximum Frequency	3.7 GHz	4 GHz8% more
Maximum Power Consumption	240 W	240 W
L1 Cache	4,096 KB	N/A
L2 Cache	32 MB	N/A
L3 Cache	256 MB	256 MB
Lithography Process	7 nm	7 nm
Is unlocked	N/A	N/A

Integrated Graphics

Feature	AMD EPYC 7713	AMD EPYC 74F3
Model	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	AMD EPYC 7713	AMD EPYC 74F3
PassMark CPU Mark	83,06637% more	60,666

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AMD EPYC 7713 vs AMD EPYC 74F3 comparison

Based on our overall comparison score, AMD EPYC 7713 rates higher at 90/100 versus 84/100 for AMD EPYC 74F3 — a 6-point lead. AMD EPYC 7713 is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.

AMD EPYC 7713 and AMD EPYC 74F3 are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 90/100 for AMD EPYC 7713 and 84/100 for AMD EPYC 74F3.

If you want the higher-rated cpus option overall, AMD EPYC 7713 (90/100) edges out AMD EPYC 74F3 (84/100). But if AMD EPYC 74F3 is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.