AMD EPYC 7713 vs AMD EPYC 7513

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the AMD EPYC 7713 is the better pick — it scores 80/100 to the AMD EPYC 7513's 64, leading on Core Specifications and Benchmark. Choose the AMD EPYC 7513 instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • AMD EPYC 7713 leads AMD EPYC 7513 overall by 16 points (80 vs 64 out of 100).
  • AMD EPYC 7713 stands out on Core Specifications L1 Cache: 4,096 KB (100% more), Core Specifications L2 Cache: 32 MB (100% more), Core Specifications L3 Cache: 256 MB (100% more).
AMD EPYC 7713 leads overall
AMD EPYC 7713
80
AMD EPYC 7513
64
Why it stands out
  • Core Specifications L1 Cache: 4,096 KB (100% more)
  • Core Specifications L2 Cache: 32 MB (100% more)
  • Core Specifications L3 Cache: 256 MB (100% more)

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

AMD EPYC 7713

The AMD EPYC 7713 is a 64-core, 128-thread server processor built on a 7nm manufacturing process and designed for high-density enterprise environments. It operates at a base clock frequency of 2.0 GHz with boost speeds reaching up to 3.7 GHz. Equipped with a massive 512 MB L3 cache and a 225W base TDP, it targets demanding server workloads requiring extensive parallel processing capabilities.

Best for High-density server virtualization and cloud infrastructure deploymentsBest for Massively multi-threaded enterprise workloads and scientific computing
Pros
  • High compute density featuring 64 cores and 128 threads
  • Generous 512 MB L3 cache to aid data-heavy server applications
  • Manageable 225W base power consumption given the high core count
Cons
  • Modest 2.0 GHz base frequency compared to processors with fewer cores
  • Requires discrete graphics or IPMI server management as it lacks integrated graphics
  • Locked multiplier prevents any manual frequency tuning

AMD EPYC 7513

The AMD EPYC 7513 is a 32-core, 64-thread server processor manufactured on a 7nm process. Designed for enterprise data centers and virtualization hosts, it delivers multithreaded performance with a 2.6 GHz base clock speed that can boost up to 3.7 GHz.

Best for High-density server deployments running virtualized environmentsBest for Enterprise data centers requiring multithreaded compute efficiency
Pros
  • High parallel processing capacity with 32 cores and 64 threads
  • Substantial 128 MB L3 cache to assist memory-bound server workloads
  • Manageable thermal footprint operating between a 165W base and 200W maximum power draw
Cons
  • Lacks integrated graphics, requiring dedicated display hardware for direct console management
  • Locked multiplier prevents manual clock tuning or custom frequency adjustments

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

AMD EPYC 771383,066
AMD EPYC 751358,964

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AMD EPYC 7713 vs AMD EPYC 7513 comparison

Based on our overall comparison score, AMD EPYC 7713 rates higher at 90/100 versus 85/100 for AMD EPYC 7513 — a 5-point lead. AMD EPYC 7713 is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.
AMD EPYC 7713 and AMD EPYC 7513 are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 90/100 for AMD EPYC 7713 and 85/100 for AMD EPYC 7513.
If you want the higher-rated cpus option overall, AMD EPYC 7713 (90/100) edges out AMD EPYC 7513 (85/100). But if AMD EPYC 7513 is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote