AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs AMD EPYC 7543

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is the better pick — it scores 78/100 to the AMD EPYC 7543's 70, leading on Core Specifications and Benchmark. Choose the AMD EPYC 7543 instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX leads AMD EPYC 7543 overall by 8 points (78 vs 70 out of 100).
  • AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX stands out on Core Specifications L1 Cache: 4,096 KB (100% more), Core Specifications L2 Cache: 32 MB (100% more), Core Specifications Cores: 64.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX leads overall
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
78
AMD EPYC 7543
70
Why it stands out
  • Core Specifications L1 Cache: 4,096 KB (100% more)
  • Core Specifications L2 Cache: 32 MB (100% more)
  • Core Specifications Cores: 64

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

AMD Ryzen microprocessors are x86-64 CPUs based on the Zen microarchitecture. The Ryzen family includes various processor lines such as Ryzen 3, Ryzen 5, and Ryzen Threadripper, which can feature up to 96 cores. Desktop processors include different generations like the Ryzen 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, etc., series.

Best for N/A
Pros
  • N/A
Cons
  • N/A

AMD EPYC 7543

The AMD EPYC 7543 is a 32-core, 64-thread server processor built on a 7nm manufacturing process, engineered for enterprise data centers and heavy server workloads. It features a base clock frequency of 2.8 GHz, a maximum boost clock of 3.7 GHz, and a substantial 256 MB of L3 cache. Designed around a 225W base power envelope, it targets high-density virtualization and compute-intensive enterprise applications.

Best for Enterprise server virtualization and cloud infrastructure deploymentBest for Memory-bound server applications benefiting from expansive L3 cache
Pros
  • 32 cores and 64 threads offer high multi-threaded compute density
  • Large 256 MB L3 cache helps mitigate memory bottlenecks in data-heavy tasks
  • Strong multi-core output demonstrated by a PassMark CPU Mark score over 60,000
Cons
  • High 225W base power draw (up to 240W max) demands robust thermal management
  • No integrated graphics onboard
  • Multiplier is locked, preventing hardware clock adjustments

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX82,018
AMD EPYC 754360,960

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Review Videos

Hand-picked expert reviews for each product

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs AMD EPYC 7543 comparison

Based on our overall comparison score, AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX rates higher at 88/100 versus 83/100 for AMD EPYC 7543 — a 5-point lead. AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX and AMD EPYC 7543 are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 88/100 for AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX and 83/100 for AMD EPYC 7543.
If you want the higher-rated cpus option overall, AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX (88/100) edges out AMD EPYC 7543 (83/100). But if AMD EPYC 7543 is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote