AMD EPYC 7713 vs AMD EPYC 7R12

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the AMD EPYC 7713 is the better pick — it scores 87/100 to the AMD EPYC 7R12's 60, leading on Core Specifications and Benchmark. Choose the AMD EPYC 7R12 instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

AMD EPYC 7713 leads overall

AMD EPYC 7713

AMD EPYC 7R12

Why it stands out

Benchmark PassMark CPU Mark: 83,066 (70% more)
Core Specifications Cores: 64
Core Specifications Threads: 128

Winner by category for AMD EPYC 7713 vs AMD EPYC 7R12
Category	AMD EPYC 7713	AMD EPYC 7R12	Winner
Core Specifications	79	43	AMD EPYC 7713
Integrated Graphics	0	0	Tie
Benchmark	92	69	AMD EPYC 7713

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

AMD EPYC 7713

The AMD EPYC 7713 is a 64-core, 128-thread server processor built on a 7nm manufacturing process and designed for high-density enterprise environments. It operates at a base clock frequency of 2.0 GHz with boost speeds reaching up to 3.7 GHz. Equipped with a massive 512 MB L3 cache and a 225W base TDP, it targets demanding server workloads requiring extensive parallel processing capabilities.

Best for High-density server virtualization and cloud infrastructure deploymentsBest for Massively multi-threaded enterprise workloads and scientific computing

Pros

High compute density featuring 64 cores and 128 threads
Generous 512 MB L3 cache to aid data-heavy server applications
Manageable 225W base power consumption given the high core count

Cons

Modest 2.0 GHz base frequency compared to processors with fewer cores
Requires discrete graphics or IPMI server management as it lacks integrated graphics
Locked multiplier prevents any manual frequency tuning

AMD EPYC 7R12

The AMD EPYC 7R12 is a server-class processor engineered for enterprise operations and cloud infrastructure demanding high parallel processing capabilities. Built on a 7nm manufacturing process, this chip provides 48 cores, 96 threads, and a generous 192 MB of L3 cache to handle intensive data-center workloads. It is designed to operate reliably within a steady 200-watt power limit.

Best for Enterprise virtualization and handling multiple simultaneous virtual machinesBest for Large-scale database hosting and cache-dependent server workloads

Pros

High core density with 48 physical cores and 96 virtual threads for massive parallelism
Generous 192 MB of L3 cache to improve data access speeds and reduce latency
Efficient 7-nanometer lithography that delivers substantial processing power within a 200W power envelope

Cons

Modest base clock speed of 2.2 GHz which may limit single-threaded performance
Locked multiplier prevents hardware optimization through overclocking
No integrated graphics processor included

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

AMD EPYC 7713

Check Price on Amazon

AMD EPYC 7R12

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

AMD EPYC 771383,066

AMD EPYC 7R1248,934

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	AMD EPYC 7713	AMD EPYC 7R12
Cores	64	48
Threads	128	96
Base Frequency	2 GHz	2.2 GHz10% more
Base Power Consumption	225 W	N/A
Maximum Frequency	3.7 GHz12% more	3.3 GHz
Maximum Power Consumption	240 W	N/A
L1 Cache	4,096 KB33% more	3,072 KB
L2 Cache	32 MB33% more	24 MB
L3 Cache	256 MB	N/A
Lithography Process	7 nm	7 nm
Is unlocked	N/A	N/A

Integrated Graphics

Feature	AMD EPYC 7713	AMD EPYC 7R12
Model	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	AMD EPYC 7713	AMD EPYC 7R12
PassMark CPU Mark	83,06670% more	48,934

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AMD EPYC 7713 vs AMD EPYC 7R12 comparison

Based on our overall comparison score, AMD EPYC 7713 rates higher at 90/100 versus 81/100 for AMD EPYC 7R12 — a 9-point lead. AMD EPYC 7713 is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.

AMD EPYC 7713 and AMD EPYC 7R12 are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 90/100 for AMD EPYC 7713 and 81/100 for AMD EPYC 7R12.

If you want the higher-rated cpus option overall, AMD EPYC 7713 (90/100) edges out AMD EPYC 7R12 (81/100). But if AMD EPYC 7R12 is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.