AMD EPYC 7713 vs Apple M5

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

AMD EPYC 7713 leads overall

AMD EPYC 7713

Apple M5

Winner by category for AMD EPYC 7713 vs Apple M5
Category	AMD EPYC 7713	Apple M5	Winner
Core Specifications	86	63	AMD EPYC 7713
Integrated Graphics	0	54	Apple M5
Benchmark	96	46	AMD EPYC 7713

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

AMD EPYC 7713

The AMD EPYC 7713 is a 64-core, 128-thread server processor built on a 7nm manufacturing process and designed for high-density enterprise environments. It operates at a base clock frequency of 2.0 GHz with boost speeds reaching up to 3.7 GHz. Equipped with a massive 512 MB L3 cache and a 225W base TDP, it targets demanding server workloads requiring extensive parallel processing capabilities.

Best for High-density server virtualization and cloud infrastructure deploymentsBest for Massively multi-threaded enterprise workloads and scientific computing

Pros

High compute density featuring 64 cores and 128 threads
Generous 512 MB L3 cache to aid data-heavy server applications
Manageable 225W base power consumption given the high core count

Cons

Modest 2.0 GHz base frequency compared to processors with fewer cores
Requires discrete graphics or IPMI server management as it lacks integrated graphics
Locked multiplier prevents any manual frequency tuning

Apple M5

AI analysis isn't ready yet

We haven't generated an in-depth write-up for Apple M5 yet. The specs, scores and strengths profile above still cover it — check back later for the AI summary.

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

AMD EPYC 7713

Check Price on Amazon

Apple M5

Check Price on Amazon

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	AMD EPYC 7713	Apple M5
Cores	64	N/A
Threads	128	N/A
Base Frequency	2 GHz	N/A
Base Power Consumption	225 W	N/A
Maximum Frequency	3.7 GHz	N/A
Maximum Power Consumption	240 W	N/A
L1 Cache	4,096 KB	N/A
L2 Cache	32 MB	N/A
L3 Cache	256 MB	N/A
Lithography Process	7 nm	N/A
Is unlocked	N/A	N/A

Integrated Graphics

Feature	AMD EPYC 7713	Apple M5
Model	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	AMD EPYC 7713	Apple M5
PassMark CPU Mark	83,066	N/A

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AMD EPYC 7713 vs Apple M5 comparison

Based on our overall comparison score, AMD EPYC 7713 rates higher at 90/100 versus 68/100 for Apple M5 — a 22-point lead. AMD EPYC 7713 is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.

AMD EPYC 7713 and Apple M5 are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 90/100 for AMD EPYC 7713 and 68/100 for Apple M5.

If you want the higher-rated cpus option overall, AMD EPYC 7713 (90/100) edges out Apple M5 (68/100). But if Apple M5 is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.