AMD EPYC 7713 vs Apple M5 Pro

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the AMD EPYC 7713 is the better pick — it scores 88/100 to the Apple M5 Pro's 71, leading on Core Specifications and Benchmark. Choose the Apple M5 Pro instead if integrated graphics matters most to you, where it comes out ahead.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

AMD EPYC 7713 leads overall

AMD EPYC 7713

Apple M5 Pro

Why it stands out

Core Specifications Cores: 64
Core Specifications Threads: 128
Benchmark PassMark CPU Mark: 83,066 (45% more)

Winner by category for AMD EPYC 7713 vs Apple M5 Pro
Category	AMD EPYC 7713	Apple M5 Pro	Winner
Core Specifications	86	63	AMD EPYC 7713
Integrated Graphics	0	56	Apple M5 Pro
Benchmark	90	76	AMD EPYC 7713

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

AMD EPYC 7713

The AMD EPYC 7713 is a 64-core, 128-thread server processor built on a 7nm manufacturing process and designed for high-density enterprise environments. It operates at a base clock frequency of 2.0 GHz with boost speeds reaching up to 3.7 GHz. Equipped with a massive 512 MB L3 cache and a 225W base TDP, it targets demanding server workloads requiring extensive parallel processing capabilities.

Best for High-density server virtualization and cloud infrastructure deploymentsBest for Massively multi-threaded enterprise workloads and scientific computing

Pros

High compute density featuring 64 cores and 128 threads
Generous 512 MB L3 cache to aid data-heavy server applications
Manageable 225W base power consumption given the high core count

Cons

Modest 2.0 GHz base frequency compared to processors with fewer cores
Requires discrete graphics or IPMI server management as it lacks integrated graphics
Locked multiplier prevents any manual frequency tuning

Apple M5 Pro

The Apple M5 is a system-on-chip designed for Apple's high-end tablet line, featured in the eighth-generation iPad Pro. It comes in 9-core or 10-core CPU configurations combined with a 10-core GPU, targeting users who require intensive mobile performance for software development, creative tasks, and machine learning.

Best for Graphics-heavy mobile workflows utilizing hardware-accelerated ray tracingBest for On-device machine learning tasks leveraging the integrated 16-core Neural Engine

Pros

Delivers up to 45% faster graphics performance over the previous M4 generation
Enhanced memory bandwidth reaching 153 GB/s alongside fast LPDDR5X RAM
Hardware-accelerated ray tracing support on the 10-core GPU
Updated wireless capabilities including Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6, and Thread support

Cons

Peak hardware configurations with 10 CPU cores and 16 GB of RAM are reserved for higher 1 TB and 2 TB storage tiers

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

AMD EPYC 7713

Check Price on Amazon

Apple M5 Pro

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

AMD EPYC 771383,066

Apple M5 Pro57,244

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Review Videos

Hand-picked expert reviews for each product

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	AMD EPYC 7713	Apple M5 Pro
Cores	64	18
Threads	128	18
Base Frequency	2 GHz	N/A
Base Power Consumption	225 W	N/A
Maximum Frequency	3.7 GHz	N/A
Maximum Power Consumption	240 W	N/A
L1 Cache	4,096 KB	N/A
L2 Cache	32 MB	N/A
L3 Cache	256 MB	N/A
Lithography Process	7 nm	3 nm57% less
Is unlocked	N/A	No

Integrated Graphics

Feature	AMD EPYC 7713	Apple M5 Pro
Model	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	AMD EPYC 7713	Apple M5 Pro
PassMark CPU Mark	83,06645% more	57,244

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AMD EPYC 7713 vs Apple M5 Pro comparison

Based on our overall comparison score, AMD EPYC 7713 rates higher at 90/100 versus 79/100 for Apple M5 Pro — a 11-point lead. AMD EPYC 7713 is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.

AMD EPYC 7713 and Apple M5 Pro are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 90/100 for AMD EPYC 7713 and 79/100 for Apple M5 Pro.

If you want the higher-rated cpus option overall, AMD EPYC 7713 (90/100) edges out Apple M5 Pro (79/100). But if Apple M5 Pro is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.