AMD EPYC 7713P vs AMD EPYC 7K62

Updated Sep 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the AMD EPYC 7713P is the better pick — it scores 88/100 to the AMD EPYC 7K62's 72, leading on Core Specifications and Benchmark. Choose the AMD EPYC 7K62 instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • AMD EPYC 7713P leads AMD EPYC 7K62 overall by 16 points (88 vs 72 out of 100).
  • AMD EPYC 7713P stands out on Core Specifications Cores: 64, Core Specifications Threads: 128, Benchmark PassMark CPU Mark: 80,736 (37% more).
AMD EPYC 7713P leads overall
AMD EPYC 7713P
88
AMD EPYC 7K62
72
Why it stands out
  • Core Specifications Cores: 64
  • Core Specifications Threads: 128
  • Benchmark PassMark CPU Mark: 80,736 (37% more)

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Sep 2026.

AMD EPYC 7713P

The AMD EPYC 7713P is a high-performance server processor designed specifically for single-socket enterprise environments. Built on a 7-nanometer process, this CPU features 64 cores and 128 threads, making it a powerful solution for heavy multi-threaded computing and virtualization tasks.

Best for High-density server virtualization and container orchestrationBest for Compute-heavy enterprise workloads requiring massive thread countsBest for Single-socket data center deployments demanding a massive memory cache
Pros
  • High core density with 64 cores and 128 threads for heavy parallel processing workloads
  • Massive L3 cache of 256 megabytes to reduce memory access latency
  • Relatively modest power envelope for its scale, with a base consumption of 225 watts
Cons
  • Lacks integrated graphics, necessitating a dedicated GPU or motherboard-based video controller
  • Locked multiplier prevents any manual overclocking adjustments

AMD EPYC 7K62

The AMD EPYC 7K62 is a server-oriented processor featuring 48 cores and 96 threads, tailored for high-density virtualization and enterprise computing environments. Released in 2022 and built on a 7-nanometer process, it balances a large 256 MB L3 cache with a moderate 155-watt power consumption profile.

Best for Enterprise virtualization and containerized server deploymentsBest for Data-intensive computing tasks that benefit from large L3 cache sizes
Pros
  • High core density with 48 physical cores and 96 threads for massive multi-tasking capabilities
  • Generous 256 MB L3 cache to enhance data retrieval speeds in data-heavy applications
  • Efficient power envelope of 155 watts relative to its overall core and thread count
Cons
  • Relatively low maximum frequency of 3.3 GHz which can restrict single-threaded tasks
  • Locked processor design with no support for overclocking
  • Does not feature integrated graphics

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

AMD EPYC 7713P80,736
AMD EPYC 7K6258,822

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AMD EPYC 7713P vs AMD EPYC 7K62 comparison

Based on our overall comparison score, AMD EPYC 7713P rates higher at 90/100 versus 85/100 for AMD EPYC 7K62 — a 5-point lead. AMD EPYC 7713P is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.
AMD EPYC 7713P and AMD EPYC 7K62 are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 90/100 for AMD EPYC 7713P and 85/100 for AMD EPYC 7K62.
If you want the higher-rated cpus option overall, AMD EPYC 7713P (90/100) edges out AMD EPYC 7K62 (85/100). But if AMD EPYC 7K62 is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote