AMD EPYC 7713P vs AMD EPYC 7R32

Updated Sep 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the AMD EPYC 7713P is the better pick — it scores 91/100 to the AMD EPYC 7R32's 83, leading on Core Specifications and Benchmark. Choose the AMD EPYC 7R32 instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

AMD EPYC 7713P leads overall

AMD EPYC 7713P

AMD EPYC 7R32

Why it stands out

Core Specifications Cores: 64
Core Specifications Threads: 128
Benchmark PassMark CPU Mark: 80,736 (26% more)

Winner by category for AMD EPYC 7713P vs AMD EPYC 7R32
Category	AMD EPYC 7713P	AMD EPYC 7R32	Winner
Core Specifications	96	86	AMD EPYC 7713P
Integrated Graphics	0	0	Tie
Benchmark	88	81	AMD EPYC 7713P

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Sep 2026.

AMD EPYC 7713P

The AMD EPYC 7713P is a high-performance server processor designed specifically for single-socket enterprise environments. Built on a 7-nanometer process, this CPU features 64 cores and 128 threads, making it a powerful solution for heavy multi-threaded computing and virtualization tasks.

Best for High-density server virtualization and container orchestrationBest for Compute-heavy enterprise workloads requiring massive thread countsBest for Single-socket data center deployments demanding a massive memory cache

Pros

High core density with 64 cores and 128 threads for heavy parallel processing workloads
Massive L3 cache of 256 megabytes to reduce memory access latency
Relatively modest power envelope for its scale, with a base consumption of 225 watts

Cons

Lacks integrated graphics, necessitating a dedicated GPU or motherboard-based video controller
Locked multiplier prevents any manual overclocking adjustments

AMD EPYC 7R32

The AMD EPYC 7R32 is a server-grade processor designed for enterprise environments, released in late 2020. Built on a 7-nanometer lithography process, this chip delivers 48 cores and 96 threads to handle demanding, highly parallel workloads.

Best for High-density server virtualization and cloud computing environmentsBest for Parallel enterprise applications that benefit from massive core counts over…

Pros

Exceptional multi-threaded capability with 48 physical cores and 96 processing threads
Efficient 7-nanometer architecture helps balance performance and energy use
Manages a high core count within a relatively modest 180-watt power envelope

Cons

Maximum boost frequency is limited to 3.3 GHz, which may restrict single-core performance
The processor is locked, preventing any manual clock speed adjustments
Lacks integrated graphics, necessitating a separate video solution

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

AMD EPYC 7713P

Check Price on Amazon

AMD EPYC 7R32

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

AMD EPYC 7713P80,736

AMD EPYC 7R3263,969

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	AMD EPYC 7713P	AMD EPYC 7R32
Cores	64	48
Threads	128	96
Base Frequency	2 GHz	2.8 GHz40% more
Base Power Consumption	225 W	N/A
Maximum Frequency	3.7 GHz12% more	3.3 GHz
Maximum Power Consumption	240 W	N/A
L1 Cache	4,096 KB	N/A
L2 Cache	32 MB	N/A
L3 Cache	256 MB	N/A
Lithography Process	N/A	7 nm
Is unlocked	N/A	N/A

Integrated Graphics

Feature	AMD EPYC 7713P	AMD EPYC 7R32
Model	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	AMD EPYC 7713P	AMD EPYC 7R32
PassMark CPU Mark	80,73626% more	63,969

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AMD EPYC 7713P vs AMD EPYC 7R32 comparison

Based on our overall comparison score, AMD EPYC 7713P rates higher at 90/100 versus 82/100 for AMD EPYC 7R32 — a 8-point lead. AMD EPYC 7713P is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.

AMD EPYC 7713P and AMD EPYC 7R32 are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 90/100 for AMD EPYC 7713P and 82/100 for AMD EPYC 7R32.

If you want the higher-rated cpus option overall, AMD EPYC 7713P (90/100) edges out AMD EPYC 7R32 (82/100). But if AMD EPYC 7R32 is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.