AMD EPYC 7763 vs Intel Xeon W 3375

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the AMD EPYC 7763 is the better pick — it scores 86/100 to the Intel Xeon W 3375's 68, leading on Core Specifications and Benchmark. Choose the Intel Xeon W 3375 instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • AMD EPYC 7763 leads Intel Xeon W 3375 overall by 18 points (86 vs 68 out of 100).
  • AMD EPYC 7763 stands out on Core Specifications L3 Cache: 256 MB (349% more), Core Specifications Cores: 64, Core Specifications Threads: 128.
AMD EPYC 7763 leads overall
AMD EPYC 7763
86
Intel Xeon W 3375
68
Why it stands out
  • Core Specifications L3 Cache: 256 MB (349% more)
  • Core Specifications Cores: 64
  • Core Specifications Threads: 128

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

AMD EPYC 7763

The AMD EPYC 7763 is a high-end server processor designed for data centers, cloud infrastructure, and enterprise computing workloads. Built on a 7nm lithography process, it features 64 cores and 128 threads with a base clock speed of 2.5 GHz and a boost speed up to 3.5 GHz. Equipped with 512 MB of L3 cache, it is tailored for demanding parallel processing tasks within a maximum power envelope of 280 watts.

Best for High-density virtualized server clusters and cloud infrastructureBest for Heavy enterprise compute tasks relying on massive parallel processing capability
Pros
  • Massive core and thread density featuring 64 cores and 128 threads for heavy parallel workloads
  • Large 512 MB L3 cache helps reduce memory bottlenecks in data-intensive tasks
  • Strong multi-threaded performance with a PassMark CPU score of 84,004
Cons
  • High maximum power consumption reaching up to 280 W demands substantial cooling infrastructure
  • Lacks integrated graphics, requiring dedicated server management hardware or discrete GPUs

Intel Xeon W 3375

This document is a list documenting Intel Xeon microprocessors organized by generation. It details various models within different core-based architectures, including the 3000 series and 5000 series.

Best for Reference/ResearchBest for Comparison
Pros
  • The source provides an exhaustive chronological listing of numerous Xeon processors
  • Processors are categorized based on model lineages (e.g., E31x, X32x, X33x, E52xx)

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Xeon W 3375

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

AMD EPYC 776384,004
Intel Xeon W 337558,686

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Review Videos

Hand-picked expert reviews for each product

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AMD EPYC 7763 vs Intel Xeon W 3375 comparison

They are closely matched: AMD EPYC 7763 scores 87/100 and Intel Xeon W 3375 scores 85/100 in our overall comparison — within 2 points. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
AMD EPYC 7763 and Intel Xeon W 3375 are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 87/100 for AMD EPYC 7763 and 85/100 for Intel Xeon W 3375.
It's close — AMD EPYC 7763 (87/100) and Intel Xeon W 3375 (85/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote