AMD EPYC 7K62 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

Updated Sep 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

Verdict

Key takeaways

  • Intel Core Ultra 9 285K leads AMD EPYC 7K62 overall by 18 points (83 vs 65 out of 100).
  • Key differences: PassMark CPU mark, where Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has 67,232 vs 58,822; L2 cache, where Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has 40 MB vs 24 MB; lithography process, where Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has 3 vs 7 nm; cores, where AMD EPYC 7K62 has 48 vs 24; threads, where AMD EPYC 7K62 has 96 vs 24.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K leads overall
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K · #32 of 465
83
AMD EPYC 7K62 · #27 of 465
65
Key differences
  • PassMark CPU MarkIntel Core Ultra 9 285K 67,232 vs 58,822
  • L2 CacheIntel Core Ultra 9 285K 40 MB vs 24 MB
  • Lithography ProcessIntel Core Ultra 9 285K 3 vs 7 nm
  • CoresAMD EPYC 7K62 48 vs 24
  • ThreadsAMD EPYC 7K62 96 vs 24

Scores by Category

Core Ultra 9 285K wins 3 of 3 categories

CategoryEPYC 7K62Core Ultra 9 285KLead
Benchmark
+7
Core Specifications
+50
Integrated Graphics
+44

Value for Money

Launch prices — enter today's prices (same currency for both).

Detailed Specifications

Core Specifications

Feature
EPYC 7K62
Core Ultra 9 285K
Cores
48
24
Threads
96
24
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
3.7 GHz42% more
Base Power Consumption
N/A
125 W
Maximum Frequency
3.3 GHz
5.7 GHz73% more
Maximum Power Consumption
N/A
250 W
L1 Cache
3,072 KB26% more
2,432 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB
40 MB67% more
L3 Cache
N/A
36 MB
Lithography Process
7 nm
3 nm57% less
Is unlocked
N/A
Yes

Integrated Graphics

Feature
EPYC 7K62
Core Ultra 9 285K
Model
N/A

Benchmark

Feature
EPYC 7K62
Core Ultra 9 285K
PassMark CPU Mark
58,822
67,23214% more

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote