AMD EPYC 7R32 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

Updated Sep 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX is the better pick — it scores 80/100 to the AMD EPYC 7R32's 67, leading on Core Specifications and Integrated Graphics. Choose the AMD EPYC 7R32 instead if benchmark matters most to you, where it comes out ahead.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX leads overall

Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

AMD EPYC 7R32

Why it stands out

Core Specifications Maximum Frequency: 5.4 GHz (64% more)
Core Specifications Lithography Process: 3 nm (57% less)

Winner by category for AMD EPYC 7R32 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
Category	Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	AMD EPYC 7R32	Winner
Core Specifications	93	29	Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
Integrated Graphics	44	0	Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
Benchmark	78	86	AMD EPYC 7R32

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Sep 2026.

AMD EPYC 7R32

The AMD EPYC 7R32 is a server-grade processor designed for enterprise environments, released in late 2020. Built on a 7-nanometer lithography process, this chip delivers 48 cores and 96 threads to handle demanding, highly parallel workloads.

Best for High-density server virtualization and cloud computing environmentsBest for Parallel enterprise applications that benefit from massive core counts over…

Pros

Exceptional multi-threaded capability with 48 physical cores and 96 processing threads
Efficient 7-nanometer architecture helps balance performance and energy use
Manages a high core count within a relatively modest 180-watt power envelope

Cons

Maximum boost frequency is limited to 3.3 GHz, which may restrict single-core performance
The processor is locked, preventing any manual clock speed adjustments
Lacks integrated graphics, necessitating a separate video solution

Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX is a high-performance mobile processor built for demanding laptop computers and portable workstations. With a PassMark CPU Mark score of 58,000, this chip is designed to deliver desktop-class processing power on the go. It is primarily built for users who need to execute resource-heavy applications, gaming, and professional-grade content creation.

Best for Intensive multi-threaded applications like 3D rendering, simulation software…Best for High-end mobile gaming configurations that demand elite levels of CPU…

Pros

Strong computational performance indicated by a high PassMark benchmark score of 58,000
Capable of handling complex multi-threaded software and heavy multitasking workloads

Cons

High energy demands typical of the HX class can significantly reduce laptop battery longevity
Generates substantial heat, requiring robust thermal cooling solutions that often increase laptop thickness and weight

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

AMD EPYC 7R32

Check Price on Amazon

Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

AMD EPYC 7R3263,969

Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX55,677

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	AMD EPYC 7R32	Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
Cores	48	24
Threads	96	24
Base Frequency	2.8 GHz4% more	2.7 GHz
Base Power Consumption	N/A	55 W
Maximum Frequency	3.3 GHz	5.4 GHz64% more
Maximum Power Consumption	N/A	160 W
L1 Cache	N/A	2,432 KB
L2 Cache	N/A	40 MB
L3 Cache	N/A	36 MB
Lithography Process	7 nm	3 nm57% less
Is unlocked	N/A	N/A

Integrated Graphics

Feature	AMD EPYC 7R32	Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
Model	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	AMD EPYC 7R32	Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
PassMark CPU Mark	63,96915% more	55,677

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AMD EPYC 7R32 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX comparison

They are closely matched: AMD EPYC 7R32 scores 82/100 and Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX scores 81/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 point. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.

AMD EPYC 7R32 and Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 82/100 for AMD EPYC 7R32 and 81/100 for Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX.

It's close — AMD EPYC 7R32 (82/100) and Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (81/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.