Intel Xeon W 3375 vs AMD EPYC 7R32

Updated Sep 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

The Intel Xeon W 3375 and AMD EPYC 7R32 are closely matched at 80 and 78/100. The Intel Xeon W 3375 edges ahead on Core Specifications, while the AMD EPYC 7R32 leads on Benchmark — pick the one whose strengths match what you'll actually use.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Intel Xeon W 3375 and AMD EPYC 7R32 are closely matched

Intel Xeon W 3375

AMD EPYC 7R32

Where Intel Xeon W 3375 stands out

Core Specifications Maximum Frequency: 4 GHz (21% more)

Where AMD EPYC 7R32 stands out

Core Specifications Cores: 48
Core Specifications Threads: 96
Core Specifications Lithography Process: 7 nm (30% less)

Winner by category for Intel Xeon W 3375 vs AMD EPYC 7R32
Category	Intel Xeon W 3375	AMD EPYC 7R32	Winner
Core Specifications	79	62	Intel Xeon W 3375
Integrated Graphics	0	0	Tie
Benchmark	81	86	AMD EPYC 7R32

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Sep 2026.

Intel Xeon W 3375

This document is a list documenting Intel Xeon microprocessors organized by generation. It details various models within different core-based architectures, including the 3000 series and 5000 series.

Best for Reference/ResearchBest for Comparison

Pros

The source provides an exhaustive chronological listing of numerous Xeon processors
Processors are categorized based on model lineages (e.g., E31x, X32x, X33x, E52xx)

AMD EPYC 7R32

The AMD EPYC 7R32 is a server-grade processor designed for enterprise environments, released in late 2020. Built on a 7-nanometer lithography process, this chip delivers 48 cores and 96 threads to handle demanding, highly parallel workloads.

Best for High-density server virtualization and cloud computing environmentsBest for Parallel enterprise applications that benefit from massive core counts over…

Pros

Exceptional multi-threaded capability with 48 physical cores and 96 processing threads
Efficient 7-nanometer architecture helps balance performance and energy use
Manages a high core count within a relatively modest 180-watt power envelope

Cons

Maximum boost frequency is limited to 3.3 GHz, which may restrict single-core performance
The processor is locked, preventing any manual clock speed adjustments
Lacks integrated graphics, necessitating a separate video solution

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Xeon W 3375

Check Price on Amazon

AMD EPYC 7R32

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Xeon W 337558,686

AMD EPYC 7R3263,969

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	Intel Xeon W 3375	AMD EPYC 7R32
Cores	38	48
Threads	76	96
Base Frequency	2.5 GHz	2.8 GHz12% more
Base Power Consumption	270 W	N/A
Maximum Frequency	4 GHz21% more	3.3 GHz
Maximum Power Consumption	N/A	N/A
L1 Cache	3,040 KB	N/A
L2 Cache	47.5 MB	N/A
L3 Cache	57 MB	N/A
Lithography Process	10 nm	7 nm30% less
Is unlocked	No	N/A

Integrated Graphics

Feature	Intel Xeon W 3375	AMD EPYC 7R32
Model	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	Intel Xeon W 3375	AMD EPYC 7R32
PassMark CPU Mark	58,686	63,9699% more

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Xeon W 3375 vs AMD EPYC 7R32 comparison

Based on our overall comparison score, Intel Xeon W 3375 rates higher at 85/100 versus 82/100 for AMD EPYC 7R32 — a 3-point lead. Intel Xeon W 3375 is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.

Intel Xeon W 3375 and AMD EPYC 7R32 are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 85/100 for Intel Xeon W 3375 and 82/100 for AMD EPYC 7R32.

If you want the higher-rated cpus option overall, Intel Xeon W 3375 (85/100) edges out AMD EPYC 7R32 (82/100). But if AMD EPYC 7R32 is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.