Intel Xeon W 3375 vs AMD EPYC 7T83

Updated Sep 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

The AMD EPYC 7T83 and Intel Xeon W 3375 are closely matched at 80 and 78/100. The AMD EPYC 7T83 edges ahead on Benchmark, while the Intel Xeon W 3375 leads on Core Specifications — pick the one whose strengths match what you'll actually use.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

AMD EPYC 7T83 and Intel Xeon W 3375 are closely matched

AMD EPYC 7T83

Intel Xeon W 3375

Where AMD EPYC 7T83 stands out

Core Specifications Cores: 64
Core Specifications Threads: 128
Benchmark PassMark CPU Mark: 81,757 (39% more)

Where Intel Xeon W 3375 stands out

Core Specifications Maximum Frequency: 4 GHz (14% more)

Winner by category for Intel Xeon W 3375 vs AMD EPYC 7T83
Category	AMD EPYC 7T83	Intel Xeon W 3375	Winner
Core Specifications	63	79	Intel Xeon W 3375
Integrated Graphics	0	0	Tie
Benchmark	89	77	AMD EPYC 7T83

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Sep 2026.

Intel Xeon W 3375

This document is a list documenting Intel Xeon microprocessors organized by generation. It details various models within different core-based architectures, including the 3000 series and 5000 series.

Best for Reference/ResearchBest for Comparison

Pros

The source provides an exhaustive chronological listing of numerous Xeon processors
Processors are categorized based on model lineages (e.g., E31x, X32x, X33x, E52xx)

AMD EPYC 7T83

The AMD EPYC 7T83 is a server-oriented processor launched in 2022 that is built on a 7-nanometer lithography process. With 64 cores and 128 threads, this enterprise chip is engineered to handle highly parallelized server workloads and demanding data center applications.

Best for Enterprise virtualization and high-density cloud computingBest for Highly parallelized database operations and data center workloads

Pros

High-density compute architecture with 64 cores and 128 threads
Large 512 MB L3 cache to facilitate rapid data access
Strong multi-threaded performance potential

Cons

High power requirements with a constant 280-watt TDP
No built-in integrated graphics
Locked multiplier prevents any overclocking

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Xeon W 3375

Check Price on Amazon

AMD EPYC 7T83

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Xeon W 337558,686

AMD EPYC 7T8381,757

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	Intel Xeon W 3375	AMD EPYC 7T83
Cores	38	64
Threads	76	128
Base Frequency	2.5 GHz	2.5 GHz
Base Power Consumption	270 W	N/A
Maximum Frequency	4 GHz14% more	3.5 GHz
Maximum Power Consumption	N/A	N/A
L1 Cache	3,040 KB	N/A
L2 Cache	47.5 MB	N/A
L3 Cache	57 MB	N/A
Lithography Process	10 nm	7 nm30% less
Is unlocked	No	N/A

Integrated Graphics

Feature	Intel Xeon W 3375	AMD EPYC 7T83
Model	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	Intel Xeon W 3375	AMD EPYC 7T83
PassMark CPU Mark	58,686	81,75739% more

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Xeon W 3375 vs AMD EPYC 7T83 comparison

Based on our overall comparison score, Intel Xeon W 3375 rates higher at 85/100 versus 82/100 for AMD EPYC 7T83 — a 3-point lead. Intel Xeon W 3375 is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.

Intel Xeon W 3375 and AMD EPYC 7T83 are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 85/100 for Intel Xeon W 3375 and 82/100 for AMD EPYC 7T83.

If you want the higher-rated cpus option overall, Intel Xeon W 3375 (85/100) edges out AMD EPYC 7T83 (82/100). But if AMD EPYC 7T83 is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.