AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX vs AMD EPYC 9654

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the AMD EPYC 9654 is the better pick — it scores 87/100 to the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX's 63, leading on Core Specifications and Benchmark. Choose the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

AMD EPYC 9654 leads overall

AMD EPYC 9654

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Why it stands out

Core Specifications L1 Cache: 6,144 KB (200% more)
Core Specifications L2 Cache: 96 MB (500% more)
Core Specifications L3 Cache: 384 MB (200% more)

Winner by category for AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX vs AMD EPYC 9654
Category	AMD EPYC 9654	AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX	Winner
Core Specifications	79	30	AMD EPYC 9654
Integrated Graphics	0	0	Tie
Benchmark	91	79	AMD EPYC 9654

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is part of the wider line of Ryzen processors, which are x86-64 microprocessors manufactured by AMD based on the Zen microarchitecture. The processor family includes chips like Ryzen 3, Ryzen 5, Ryzen 7, and Ryzen Threadripper, supporting up to 96 cores.

Pros

Supports Simultaneous Multithreading (SMT)

AMD EPYC 9654

The AMD EPYC 9654 is a high-performance server processor built on a 5nm manufacturing process, designed primarily for enterprise data centers and heavy cloud workloads. It features 96 cores and 192 threads with a base clock frequency of 2.4 GHz that can boost up to 3.7 GHz. Equipped with a massive 384 MB L3 cache, it offers massive parallel processing performance for demanding compute environments.

Best for High-density cloud virtualization and multi-tenant server infrastructureBest for Intensive enterprise workloads requiring maximum multi-threaded performance

Pros

Extremely high core density with 96 cores and 192 threads for massive multi-threading
Large 384 MB L3 cache to benefit cache-sensitive server applications
Built on an advanced 5nm lithography node

Cons

High power draw with a base power of 320W and a maximum rating of 400W
Does not feature integrated graphics

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Check Price on Amazon

AMD EPYC 9654

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX75,043

AMD EPYC 9654118,543

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Review Videos

Hand-picked expert reviews for each product

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX	AMD EPYC 9654
Cores	32	96
Threads	64	192
Base Frequency	3.6 GHz50% more	2.4 GHz
Base Power Consumption	280 W	360 W29% more
Maximum Frequency	4.5 GHz22% more	3.7 GHz
Maximum Power Consumption	N/A	400 W
L1 Cache	2,048 KB	6,144 KB200% more
L2 Cache	16 MB	96 MB500% more
L3 Cache	128 MB	384 MB200% more
Lithography Process	7 nm	5 nm29% less
Is unlocked	Yes	N/A

Integrated Graphics

Feature	AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX	AMD EPYC 9654
Model	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX	AMD EPYC 9654
PassMark CPU Mark	75,043	118,54358% more

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX vs AMD EPYC 9654 comparison

They are closely matched: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX scores 91/100 and AMD EPYC 9654 scores 90/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 point. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and AMD EPYC 9654 are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 91/100 for AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and 90/100 for AMD EPYC 9654.

It's close — AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX (91/100) and AMD EPYC 9654 (90/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.