Intel Core Ultra X7 368H vs AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT

Updated Sep 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H and AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT are closely matched at 63 and 62/100. The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H edges ahead on Integrated Graphics, while the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT leads on value — pick the one whose strengths match what you'll actually use.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • Intel Core Ultra X7 368H and AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT are closely matched overall (within 1 point).
  • Intel Core Ultra X7 368H stands out on Core Specifications L1 Cache: 1,600 KB (108% more), Core Specifications L2 Cache: 24 MB (300% more), Core Specifications Cores: 16.
  • AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT counters with Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 105 W (320% more), Core Specifications L3 Cache: 64 MB (256% more), Core Specifications Threads: 24.
Intel Core Ultra X7 368H and AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT are closely matched
Intel Core Ultra X7 368H
63
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
62
Where Intel Core Ultra X7 368H stands out
  • Core Specifications L1 Cache: 1,600 KB (108% more)
  • Core Specifications L2 Cache: 24 MB (300% more)
  • Core Specifications Cores: 16
Where AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT stands out
  • Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 105 W (320% more)
  • Core Specifications L3 Cache: 64 MB (256% more)
  • Core Specifications Threads: 24

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Sep 2026.

Intel Core Ultra X7 368H

The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H is a high-performance mobile processor designed to handle demanding computing workloads. With a PassMark CPU Mark score of 37500, this chip is built for users requiring substantial processing power in portable form factors.

Best for Resource-heavy applications and demanding multitasking workloads
Pros
  • Strong multi-threaded performance with a PassMark score of 37500
  • Capable of handling intensive productivity and creative tasks
Cons
  • Limited official specifications and architectural details are currently available beyond initial benchmark data

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT

The provided sources do not contain specific information on an AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT processor. The context available describes various generations of Ryzen microprocessors, including the Ryzen 3000 series and general product lines.

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Core Ultra X7 368H

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Core Ultra X7 368H33,547
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT32,460

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Review Videos

Hand-picked expert reviews for each product

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Core Ultra X7 368H vs AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT comparison

They are closely matched: Intel Core Ultra X7 368H scores 67/100 and AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT scores 66/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 point. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
Intel Core Ultra X7 368H and AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 67/100 for Intel Core Ultra X7 368H and 66/100 for AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT.
It's close — Intel Core Ultra X7 368H (67/100) and AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT (66/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote