AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT vs Intel Xeon Gold 6242R

Updated Jun 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT is the better pick — it scores 63/100 to the Intel Xeon Gold 6242R's 57, leading on Core Specifications. Choose the Intel Xeon Gold 6242R instead if benchmark matters most to you, where it comes out ahead.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT leads overall

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT

Intel Xeon Gold 6242R

Why it stands out

Core Specifications L3 Cache: 64 MB (79% more)
Core Specifications Lithography Process: 7 nm (50% less)
Core Specifications Base Frequency: 3.8 GHz (23% more)

Winner by category for AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT vs Intel Xeon Gold 6242R
Category	AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT	Intel Xeon Gold 6242R	Winner
Core Specifications	65	39	AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
Integrated Graphics	0	0	Tie
Benchmark	62	66	Intel Xeon Gold 6242R

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jun 2026.

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT

The provided sources do not contain specific information on an AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT processor. The context available describes various generations of Ryzen microprocessors, including the Ryzen 3000 series and general product lines.

Intel Xeon Gold 6242R

The Intel Xeon Gold series represents a class of powerful microprocessors within the broader range of Intel Xeon processors. These chips are designed for server applications and systems requiring sustained, high-performance computing.

Best for serversBest for high-performance computing

Pros

Is part of the general list of Intel Xeon processors by generation
Includes models across various generations (e.g., Skylake-based, Comet Lake-based, Ice Lake-based, Sapphire Rapids-based)

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT

Check Price on Amazon

Intel Xeon Gold 6242R

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT32,460

Intel Xeon Gold 6242R35,025

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Review Videos

Hand-picked expert reviews for each product

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT	Intel Xeon Gold 6242R
Cores	12	20
Threads	24	40
Base Frequency	3.8 GHz23% more	3.1 GHz
Base Power Consumption	105 W	205 W95% more
Maximum Frequency	4.7 GHz15% more	4.1 GHz
Maximum Power Consumption	N/A	N/A
L1 Cache	768 KB	N/A
L2 Cache	6 MB	20 MB233% more
L3 Cache	64 MB79% more	35.75 MB
Lithography Process	7 nm50% less	14 nm
Is unlocked	Yes	No

Integrated Graphics

Feature	AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT	Intel Xeon Gold 6242R
Model	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT	Intel Xeon Gold 6242R
PassMark CPU Mark	32,460	35,0258% more

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT vs Intel Xeon Gold 6242R comparison

They are closely matched: AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT scores 66/100 and Intel Xeon Gold 6242R scores 66/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 points. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT and Intel Xeon Gold 6242R are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 66/100 for AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT and 66/100 for Intel Xeon Gold 6242R.

It's close — AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT (66/100) and Intel Xeon Gold 6242R (66/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.