Apple M2 Max vs AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

Updated Sep 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS is the better pick — it scores 67/100 to the Apple M2 Max's 49, leading on Core Specifications and Benchmark. Choose the Apple M2 Max instead if integrated graphics matters most to you, where it comes out ahead.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS leads Apple M2 Max overall by 18 points (67 vs 49 out of 100).
  • AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS stands out on Core Specifications Threads: 16, Core Specifications Lithography Process: 4 nm (20% less), Benchmark PassMark CPU Mark: 29,126 (9% more).
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS leads overall
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
67
Apple M2 Max
49
Why it stands out
  • Core Specifications Threads: 16
  • Core Specifications Lithography Process: 4 nm (20% less)
  • Benchmark PassMark CPU Mark: 29,126 (9% more)

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Sep 2026.

Apple M2 Max

The Apple M2 Max is a high-performance system-on-a-chip designed by Apple Inc., intended for professional computing tasks. Due to its advanced specifications, it powers applications requiring intensive computational resources, such as video editing and 3D rendering. It is best suited for creative professionals and developers who demand top-tier performance in portable forms.

Best for Video ProductionBest for 3D RenderingBest for Software Development
Pros
  • Offers substantial processing power through a combined CPU/GPU design.
  • The integrated graphics capability (up to 76 cores) provides extensive visual compute resources.
  • Features advanced memory support, capable of high data transfer rates (LPDDR5 up to 192 GB).
Cons
  • While powerful, the chip is designed for professional workloads rather than routine general computing.
  • Its high specification level may result in a premium cost point.

AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS is a high-performance laptop processor configured with 8 cores and 16 threads to handle demanding mobile workloads. It operates at a base power consumption of 45 Watts and is built for compatible FP7, FP7r2, and FP8 platforms. This chip is designed for users who require robust multi-threaded processing power in portable computer systems.

Best for Resource-heavy mobile multitasking and content creationBest for High-performance gaming laptops requiring strong CPU throughput
Pros
  • High processing capability indicated by a PassMark CPU Mark benchmark of 34,000
  • Strong multitasking performance delivered through 8 cores and 16 threads
  • Generous memory buffer with a combined 24 megabytes of L2 and L3 cache
Cons
  • A 45-Watt base power requirement may demand robust thermal management and reduce battery life in thin laptop designs

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Apple M2 Max26,839
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS29,126

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Review Videos

Hand-picked expert reviews for each product

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Apple M2 Max vs AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS comparison

They are closely matched: Apple M2 Max scores 60/100 and AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS scores 59/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 point. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
Apple M2 Max and AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 60/100 for Apple M2 Max and 59/100 for AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS.
It's close — Apple M2 Max (60/100) and AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (59/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote