AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX vs Apple M4 Pro (14 Core)

Updated Jun 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX is the better pick — it scores 74/100 to the Apple M4 Pro (14 Core)'s 64, leading on Core Specifications and Benchmark. Choose the Apple M4 Pro (14 Core) instead if integrated graphics matters most to you, where it comes out ahead.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX leads Apple M4 Pro (14 Core) overall by 10 points (74 vs 64 out of 100).
  • AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX stands out on Core Specifications Threads: 24, Benchmark PassMark CPU Mark: 40,211 (6% more).
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX leads overall
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
74
Apple M4 Pro (14 Core)
64
Why it stands out
  • Core Specifications Threads: 24
  • Benchmark PassMark CPU Mark: 40,211 (6% more)

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jun 2026.

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO series is a line of x86-64 microprocessors manufactured by AMD conceptus. The processors include the Ryzen model name in their branding and feature various core counts, up to 96 cores. They fall under the broader category of Ryzen processors.

Pros
  • A range of models supports core counts between Ryzen 3 and Threadripper (up to 96 cores)

Apple M4 Pro (14 Core)

The Apple M4 Pro is a System-on-a-Chip (SoC) developed by Apple, featuring specialized components for computing, graphics, and neural processing. With variations allowing 12 or 14 CPU cores and 16 or 20 GPU cores, it is positioned for mid-to-high-end users who require substantial power for complex creative workflows.

Best for Professional video editingBest for High-fidelity graphics renderingBest for AI and machine learning development
Pros
  • Includes a higher core count in both the CPU (up to 14) and GPU (up to 20) compared to base M4 models, enhancing versatility
  • Offers significantly improved memory bandwidth via LPDDR5X technology, reaching up to 273 GB/s with larger configurations (Source 1)
  • The dedicated NPU is highly capable, supporting AI workloads due to its advanced processing power metrics (Source 1)
Cons
  • Its primary function is tied to specific Apple hardware platforms (e.g., MacBook Pro), limiting standalone flexibility for other manufacturers
  • While powerful, the M4 Pro's performance benchmarks mean it operates within a highly integrated ecosystem that can restrict upgradeability (Source 1)

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Apple M4 Pro (14 Core)

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX40,211
Apple M4 Pro (14 Core)37,932

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Review Videos

Hand-picked expert reviews for each product

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX vs Apple M4 Pro (14 Core) comparison

They are closely matched: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX scores 72/100 and Apple M4 Pro (14 Core) scores 72/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 points. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX and Apple M4 Pro (14 Core) are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 72/100 for AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX and 72/100 for Apple M4 Pro (14 Core).
It's close — AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX (72/100) and Apple M4 Pro (14 Core) (72/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote