Intel Core i5 13600KF vs Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

Updated Sep 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

The Intel Core i5 13600KF and Intel Core Ultra 9 386H are closely matched at 63 and 62/100. The Intel Core i5 13600KF edges ahead, while the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H leads on Core Specifications and Integrated Graphics — pick the one whose strengths match what you'll actually use.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • Intel Core i5 13600KF and Intel Core Ultra 9 386H are closely matched overall (within 1 point).
  • Intel Core i5 13600KF stands out on Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 125 W (400% more), Core Specifications Maximum Power Consumption: 181 W (126% more), Core Specifications Threads: 20.
  • Intel Core Ultra 9 386H counters with Core Specifications Cores: 16, Core Specifications L1 Cache: 1,600 KB (28% more), Core Specifications L2 Cache: 24 MB (20% more).
Intel Core i5 13600KF and Intel Core Ultra 9 386H are closely matched
Intel Core i5 13600KF
63
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
62
Where Intel Core i5 13600KF stands out
  • Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 125 W (400% more)
  • Core Specifications Maximum Power Consumption: 181 W (126% more)
  • Core Specifications Threads: 20
Where Intel Core Ultra 9 386H stands out
  • Core Specifications Cores: 16
  • Core Specifications L1 Cache: 1,600 KB (28% more)
  • Core Specifications L2 Cache: 24 MB (20% more)

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Sep 2026.

Intel Core i5 13600KF

The Intel Core i5 13600KF is part of the 13th Generation line of Intel Core processors, which includes Raptor Lake architecture. It belongs to a series designed for enhanced computational performance in modern computing devices.

Best for general useBest for high performance tasks
Pros
  • Part of the 13th Gen Intel Core processors
  • Offers unrivaled performance

Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

The Intel Core Ultra 9 386H is a high-performance mobile processor designed for premium, power-oriented laptop computers. Featuring a robust PassMark CPU Mark score of 44,000, this system-on-chip is engineered to handle demanding computational workloads and heavy multitasking on the go.

Best for Intense multi-threaded workflows such as video rendering, 3D compilation, and…Best for Premium gaming laptops and high-end mobile workstations
Pros
  • Delivers exceptional multi-threaded performance, validated by a PassMark score of 44,000
  • Tailored for high-end portable computing setups requiring desktop-class processing power
Cons
  • High performance potential typically results in increased thermal output and elevated power consumption under load

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Core i5 13600KF

Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Core i5 13600KF37,297
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H36,183

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Core i5 13600KF vs Intel Core Ultra 9 386H comparison

They are closely matched: Intel Core i5 13600KF scores 69/100 and Intel Core Ultra 9 386H scores 68/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 point. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
Intel Core i5 13600KF and Intel Core Ultra 9 386H are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 69/100 for Intel Core i5 13600KF and 68/100 for Intel Core Ultra 9 386H.
It's close — Intel Core i5 13600KF (69/100) and Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (68/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote