Intel Core i7 13700F vs Intel Xeon W 3335

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the Intel Core i7 13700F is the better pick — it scores 66/100 to the Intel Xeon W 3335's 59, leading on Core Specifications. Choose the Intel Xeon W 3335 instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • Intel Core i7 13700F leads Intel Xeon W 3335 overall by 7 points (66 vs 59 out of 100).
  • Intel Core i7 13700F stands out on Core Specifications Maximum Frequency: 5.2 GHz (30% more), Core Specifications Lithography Process: 7 nm (30% less), Core Specifications L3 Cache: 30 MB (25% more).
Intel Core i7 13700F leads overall
Intel Core i7 13700F
66
Intel Xeon W 3335
59
Why it stands out
  • Core Specifications Maximum Frequency: 5.2 GHz (30% more)
  • Core Specifications Lithography Process: 7 nm (30% less)
  • Core Specifications L3 Cache: 30 MB (25% more)

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

Intel Core i7 13700F

The Intel Core i7 13700F is a 16-core, 24-thread desktop processor designed for the LGA1700 platform with peak boost speeds reaching up to 5.2 GHz. Operating at a 65W base power envelope, it omits integrated graphics and multiplier overclocking support in favor of a lower baseline power rating. It is tailored for mainstream gamers and productivity users who rely on a dedicated graphics card.

Best for Desktop PC builds with a dedicated graphics cardBest for Multi-threaded creative work and heavy multitasking on LGA1700 systems
Pros
  • High multi-threaded capacity with 16 cores and 24 threads
  • Reaches maximum boost frequencies of up to 5.2 GHz
  • Low 65W base power draw during moderate operational loads
Cons
  • Lacks integrated graphics output, requiring a discrete GPU
  • Locked multiplier prevents traditional manual overclocking
  • Peak power consumption can ramp up to 219W under maximum workload demand

Intel Xeon W 3335

The provided source is a comprehensive list of Intel Xeon processors categorized by generation. It tracks the evolution of various processor lines, but it does not provide specific details for the Intel Xeon W 3335 model.

Cons
  • No specifications or data available for this specific model in the provided source.

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Core i7 13700F

Intel Xeon W 3335

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Core i7 13700F37,720
Intel Xeon W 333539,293

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Review Videos

Hand-picked expert reviews for each product

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Core i7 13700F vs Intel Xeon W 3335 comparison

They are closely matched: Intel Core i7 13700F scores 70/100 and Intel Xeon W 3335 scores 69/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 point. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
Intel Core i7 13700F and Intel Xeon W 3335 are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 70/100 for Intel Core i7 13700F and 69/100 for Intel Xeon W 3335.
It's close — Intel Core i7 13700F (70/100) and Intel Xeon W 3335 (69/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote