Intel Xeon W 3375 vs Intel Core i9 12900F

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the Intel Xeon W 3375 is the better pick — it scores 78/100 to the Intel Core i9 12900F's 55, leading on Core Specifications and Benchmark. Choose the Intel Core i9 12900F instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Intel Xeon W 3375 leads overall

Intel Xeon W 3375

Intel Core i9 12900F

Why it stands out

Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 270 W (315% more)
Core Specifications L1 Cache: 3,040 KB (116% more)
Core Specifications L2 Cache: 47.5 MB (239% more)

Winner by category for Intel Xeon W 3375 vs Intel Core i9 12900F
Category	Intel Xeon W 3375	Intel Core i9 12900F	Winner
Core Specifications	59	47	Intel Xeon W 3375
Integrated Graphics	0	0	Tie
Benchmark	88	60	Intel Xeon W 3375

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

Intel Xeon W 3375

This document is a list documenting Intel Xeon microprocessors organized by generation. It details various models within different core-based architectures, including the 3000 series and 5000 series.

Best for Reference/ResearchBest for Comparison

Pros

The source provides an exhaustive chronological listing of numerous Xeon processors
Processors are categorized based on model lineages (e.g., E31x, X32x, X33x, E52xx)

Intel Core i9 12900F

The Intel Core i9 12900F is a desktop processor built for the LGA1700 platform, featuring 16 cores and 24 threads. It runs at a base clock speed of 2.4 GHz and can boost up to 5.1 GHz for demanding computational tasks. Designed without integrated graphics or overclocking support, this CPU is aimed at performance-focused users who plan to use a discrete graphics card.

Best for Desktops built primarily for gaming with a dedicated graphics cardBest for Content creation and video rendering builds that do not require CPU overclocking

Pros

High 16-core, 24-thread configuration for heavy multi-threaded workloads
Boost clock speeds reaching up to 5.1 GHz
Modest 65W base power consumption under standard operation

Cons

Lacks integrated graphics, requiring a discrete GPU for display output
Locked processor multiplier prevents manual overclocking
Maximum power consumption scales up to 202W under peak loads

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Xeon W 3375

Check Price on Amazon

Intel Core i9 12900F

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Xeon W 337558,686

Intel Core i9 12900F35,748

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	Intel Xeon W 3375	Intel Core i9 12900F
Cores	38	16
Threads	76	24
Base Frequency	2.5 GHz4% more	2.4 GHz
Base Power Consumption	270 W315% more	65 W
Maximum Frequency	4 GHz	5.1 GHz27% more
Maximum Power Consumption	N/A	202 W
L1 Cache	3,040 KB116% more	1,408 KB
L2 Cache	47.5 MB239% more	14 MB
L3 Cache	57 MB90% more	30 MB
Lithography Process	10 nm	7 nm30% less
Is unlocked	No	No

Integrated Graphics

Feature	Intel Xeon W 3375	Intel Core i9 12900F
Model	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	Intel Xeon W 3375	Intel Core i9 12900F
PassMark CPU Mark	58,68664% more	35,748

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Xeon W 3375 vs Intel Core i9 12900F comparison

Based on our overall comparison score, Intel Xeon W 3375 rates higher at 85/100 versus 67/100 for Intel Core i9 12900F — a 18-point lead. Intel Xeon W 3375 is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.

Intel Xeon W 3375 and Intel Core i9 12900F are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 85/100 for Intel Xeon W 3375 and 67/100 for Intel Core i9 12900F.

If you want the higher-rated cpus option overall, Intel Xeon W 3375 (85/100) edges out Intel Core i9 12900F (67/100). But if Intel Core i9 12900F is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.