Intel Xeon W 3375 vs Intel Core i9 12900KS

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the Intel Xeon W 3375 is the better pick — it scores 77/100 to the Intel Core i9 12900KS's 61, leading on Core Specifications and Benchmark. Choose the Intel Core i9 12900KS instead if integrated graphics matters most to you, where it comes out ahead.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • Intel Xeon W 3375 leads Intel Core i9 12900KS overall by 16 points (77 vs 61 out of 100).
  • Intel Xeon W 3375 stands out on Core Specifications L1 Cache: 3,040 KB (116% more), Core Specifications L2 Cache: 47.5 MB (239% more), Core Specifications L3 Cache: 57 MB (90% more).
Intel Xeon W 3375 leads overall
Intel Xeon W 3375
77
Intel Core i9 12900KS
61
Why it stands out
  • Core Specifications L1 Cache: 3,040 KB (116% more)
  • Core Specifications L2 Cache: 47.5 MB (239% more)
  • Core Specifications L3 Cache: 57 MB (90% more)

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

Intel Xeon W 3375

This document is a list documenting Intel Xeon microprocessors organized by generation. It details various models within different core-based architectures, including the 3000 series and 5000 series.

Best for Reference/ResearchBest for Comparison
Pros
  • The source provides an exhaustive chronological listing of numerous Xeon processors
  • Processors are categorized based on model lineages (e.g., E31x, X32x, X33x, E52xx)

Intel Core i9 12900KS

The Intel Core i9 12900KS is a top-tier desktop processor designed for the LGA1700 platform, equipped with 16 cores and 24 threads. It features a maximum boost clock frequency of up to 5.5 GHz alongside integrated Intel UHD Graphics 770. Built for enthusiasts and demanding power users, it prioritizes extreme single-core and multi-core performance, though it demands a robust cooling solution to manage its thermal output.

Best for High-framerate PC gaming requiring top-tier single-core clock speedsBest for Demanding multi-threaded tasks such as video rendering and 3D animation
Pros
  • High peak clock speeds reaching up to 5.5 GHz
  • 16 cores and 24 threads provide strong multi-threaded performance
  • Unlocked design allows for manual user overclocking
  • Includes integrated Intel UHD Graphics 770 for display output without a discrete GPU
Cons
  • High maximum power consumption reaching 241 W under heavy workloads
  • 150 W base power requirement requires substantial thermal management

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Xeon W 3375

Intel Core i9 12900KS

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Xeon W 337558,686
Intel Core i9 12900KS43,378

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Review Videos

Hand-picked expert reviews for each product

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Xeon W 3375 vs Intel Core i9 12900KS comparison

Based on our overall comparison score, Intel Xeon W 3375 rates higher at 85/100 versus 70/100 for Intel Core i9 12900KS — a 15-point lead. Intel Xeon W 3375 is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.
Intel Xeon W 3375 and Intel Core i9 12900KS are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 85/100 for Intel Xeon W 3375 and 70/100 for Intel Core i9 12900KS.
If you want the higher-rated cpus option overall, Intel Xeon W 3375 (85/100) edges out Intel Core i9 12900KS (70/100). But if Intel Core i9 12900KS is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote