Intel Xeon Gold 6342 vs Intel Core i9 13980HX

Updated Jun 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the Intel Core i9 13980HX is the better pick — it scores 70/100 to the Intel Xeon Gold 6342's 63, leading on Core Specifications and Integrated Graphics. Choose the Intel Xeon Gold 6342 instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Intel Core i9 13980HX leads overall

Intel Core i9 13980HX

Intel Xeon Gold 6342

Why it stands out

Core Specifications Maximum Frequency: 5.6 GHz (60% more)
Core Specifications Lithography Process: 7 nm (30% less)
Core Specifications L2 Cache: 32 MB (7% more)

Winner by category for Intel Xeon Gold 6342 vs Intel Core i9 13980HX
Category	Intel Core i9 13980HX	Intel Xeon Gold 6342	Winner
Core Specifications	70	39	Intel Core i9 13980HX
Integrated Graphics	44	0	Intel Core i9 13980HX
Benchmark	73	75	Tie

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jun 2026.

Intel Xeon Gold 6342

This document chapter lists Intel Xeon processors by generation and architecture. It serves as a navigational index rather than providing detailed product specifications for specific models.

Best for ResearchBest for Comparison lookup

Pros

Categorizes CPUs into generations (P6, NetBurst, Core, etc.)
Allows browsing of processors by dedicated series (e.g., Platinum, Gold)
Identifies major processor architectures like Kaby Lake and Skylake

Cons

Does not provide technical details for specific CPU models.
Content is primarily a list or index structure.

Intel Core i9 13980HX

The product name is listed as an Intel processor type in technical hardware lists. It belongs to the 13th generation of Intel Core processors, according to video sources.

Pros

It utilizes the architecture associated with the 13th Gen Intel Core processors.

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Xeon Gold 6342

Check Price on Amazon

Intel Core i9 13980HX

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Xeon Gold 634247,076

Intel Core i9 13980HX45,231

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	Intel Xeon Gold 6342	Intel Core i9 13980HX
Cores	24	24
Threads	48	32
Base Frequency	2.8 GHz27% more	2.2 GHz
Base Power Consumption	230 W318% more	55 W
Maximum Frequency	3.5 GHz	5.6 GHz60% more
Maximum Power Consumption	N/A	157 W
L1 Cache	N/A	2,176 KB
L2 Cache	30 MB	32 MB7% more
L3 Cache	36 MB	36 MB
Lithography Process	10 nm	7 nm30% less
Is unlocked	No	Yes

Integrated Graphics

Feature	Intel Xeon Gold 6342	Intel Core i9 13980HX
Model	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	Intel Xeon Gold 6342	Intel Core i9 13980HX
PassMark CPU Mark	47,0764% more	45,231

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Xeon Gold 6342 vs Intel Core i9 13980HX comparison

They are closely matched: Intel Xeon Gold 6342 scores 76/100 and Intel Core i9 13980HX scores 75/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 point. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.

Intel Xeon Gold 6342 and Intel Core i9 13980HX are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 76/100 for Intel Xeon Gold 6342 and 75/100 for Intel Core i9 13980HX.

It's close — Intel Xeon Gold 6342 (76/100) and Intel Core i9 13980HX (75/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.