Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Xeon E 2356G

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

Verdict

Key takeaways

  • Intel Core Ultra 9 285K leads Intel Xeon E 2356G overall by 58 points (88 vs 30 out of 100).
  • Key differences: PassMark CPU mark, where Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has 67,232 vs 18,391; L3 cache, where Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has 36 MB vs 12 MB; lithography process, where Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has 3 vs 14 nm; cores, where Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has 24 vs 6; threads, where Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has 24 vs 12.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K leads overall
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K · 84 overall, #32 of 470
88
Intel Xeon E 2356G · 38 overall, #353 of 470
30
Key differences
  • PassMark CPU MarkIntel Core Ultra 9 285K 67,232 vs 18,391
  • L3 CacheIntel Core Ultra 9 285K 36 MB vs 12 MB
  • Lithography ProcessIntel Core Ultra 9 285K 3 vs 14 nm
  • CoresIntel Core Ultra 9 285K 24 vs 6
  • ThreadsIntel Core Ultra 9 285K 24 vs 12

Scores by Category

Core Ultra 9 285K wins 2 of 3 categories

CategoryCore Ultra 9 285KXeon E 2356GLead
Benchmark
+63
Core Specifications
+63
Integrated Graphics
Tie

Value for Money

Launch prices — enter today's prices (same currency for both).

Detailed Specifications

Core Specifications

Feature
Core Ultra 9 285K
Xeon E 2356G
Cores
24
6
Threads
24
12
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz16% more
3.2 GHz
Base Power Consumption
125 W
80 W36% less
Maximum Frequency
5.7 GHz14% more
5 GHz
Maximum Power Consumption
250 W
N/A
L1 Cache
2,432 KB
N/A
L2 Cache
40 MB
N/A
L3 Cache
36 MB200% more
12 MB
Lithography Process
3 nm79% less
14 nm
Is unlocked
Yes
No

Integrated Graphics

Feature
Core Ultra 9 285K
Xeon E 2356G
Model

Benchmark

Feature
Core Ultra 9 285K
Xeon E 2356G
PassMark CPU Mark
67,232266% more
18,391

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote