Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Xeon Gold 6248R

Updated Jun 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is the better pick — it scores 83/100 to the Intel Xeon Gold 6248R's 50, leading on Core Specifications and Integrated Graphics. Choose the Intel Xeon Gold 6248R instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • Intel Core Ultra 9 285K leads Intel Xeon Gold 6248R overall by 33 points (83 vs 50 out of 100).
  • Intel Core Ultra 9 285K stands out on Benchmark PassMark CPU Mark: 67,232 (86% more), Core Specifications Lithography Process: 3 nm (79% less), Core Specifications L2 Cache: 40 MB (67% more).
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K leads overall
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
83
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R
50
Why it stands out
  • Benchmark PassMark CPU Mark: 67,232 (86% more)
  • Core Specifications Lithography Process: 3 nm (79% less)
  • Core Specifications L2 Cache: 40 MB (67% more)

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jun 2026.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is a high-performance microprocessor utilizing the Arrow Lake microarchitecture. This type of processor, which debuted in 2024, is engineered for demanding desktop computing tasks. It is best suited for power users and enthusiasts requiring exceptional computational capability.

Best for high-performance tasksBest for content creationBest for intensive gaming
Pros
  • Designed on the modern Arrow Lake architecture (Source 1)
  • Represents a powerful step in Intel’s Core series development (Source 2)
  • Targeted as a desktop processor for high-end performance computing (Inferred from product type and general knowledge)
Cons
  • Requires specific system compatibility to leverage its modern microarchitecture (General PC knowledge)
  • The product is associated with the Arrow Lake platform, indicating it belongs to Intel's current generation offerings (Source 1)

Intel Xeon Gold 6248R

This list details various Intel Xeon microprocessors organized by their specific underlying architecture and generation. It serves as an index for generations of processors spanning multiple decades.

Pros
  • The sources provide a chronological overview of Intel Xeon processor developments.
  • Architectures are clearly segregated (e.g., P6-based, Core-based, various series).
Cons
  • The provided source only contains an indexed list and does not offer specific technical details for the Xeon Gold 6248R.

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

Intel Xeon Gold 6248R

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K67,232
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R36,067

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Xeon Gold 6248R comparison

Based on our overall comparison score, Intel Core Ultra 9 285K rates higher at 84/100 versus 67/100 for Intel Xeon Gold 6248R — a 17-point lead. Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and Intel Xeon Gold 6248R are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 84/100 for Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and 67/100 for Intel Xeon Gold 6248R.
If you want the higher-rated cpus option overall, Intel Core Ultra 9 285K (84/100) edges out Intel Xeon Gold 6248R (67/100). But if Intel Xeon Gold 6248R is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote