Intel Core Ultra 9 386H vs Intel Core Ultra X7 358H

Updated Sep 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

The Intel Core Ultra 9 386H and Intel Core Ultra X7 358H are closely matched at 60 and 58/100. The Intel Core Ultra 9 386H edges ahead on Integrated Graphics and Benchmark, while the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H leads on value — pick the one whose strengths match what you'll actually use.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • Intel Core Ultra 9 386H and Intel Core Ultra X7 358H are closely matched overall (within 2 points).
  • Intel Core Ultra 9 386H stands out on Benchmark PassMark CPU Mark: 36,183 (8% more).
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H and Intel Core Ultra X7 358H are closely matched
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
60
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
58
Where Intel Core Ultra 9 386H stands out
  • Benchmark PassMark CPU Mark: 36,183 (8% more)

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Sep 2026.

Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

The Intel Core Ultra 9 386H is a high-performance mobile processor designed for premium, power-oriented laptop computers. Featuring a robust PassMark CPU Mark score of 44,000, this system-on-chip is engineered to handle demanding computational workloads and heavy multitasking on the go.

Best for Intense multi-threaded workflows such as video rendering, 3D compilation, and…Best for Premium gaming laptops and high-end mobile workstations
Pros
  • Delivers exceptional multi-threaded performance, validated by a PassMark score of 44,000
  • Tailored for high-end portable computing setups requiring desktop-class processing power
Cons
  • High performance potential typically results in increased thermal output and elevated power consumption under load

Intel Core Ultra X7 358H

The Intel Core Ultra X7 358H is a high-performance processor designed to handle demanding computing workloads. With a documented PassMark CPU Mark score of 36,000, this chip is engineered to provide robust processing capabilities. It is built for integration into modern, performance-oriented systems requiring significant processing power.

Best for Resource-heavy applications and software developmentBest for High-performance portable or small form factor computing setups
Pros
  • Delivers strong multi-threaded performance, as indicated by a PassMark CPU Mark score of 36,000
  • Modern architecture designed for intensive computing tasks
Cons
  • Limited publicly detailed specifications regarding core configurations, power consumption, and thermal limits in official documentation

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

Intel Core Ultra X7 358H

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Core Ultra 9 386H36,183
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H33,559

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Review Videos

Hand-picked expert reviews for each product

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Core Ultra 9 386H vs Intel Core Ultra X7 358H comparison

They are closely matched: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H scores 68/100 and Intel Core Ultra X7 358H scores 68/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 points. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H and Intel Core Ultra X7 358H are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 68/100 for Intel Core Ultra 9 386H and 68/100 for Intel Core Ultra X7 358H.
It's close — Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (68/100) and Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (68/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote