Intel Xeon W 3335 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

Updated Sep 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the Intel Xeon W 3335 is the better pick — it scores 66/100 to the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H's 63, leading on Benchmark. Choose the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H instead if core specifications and integrated graphics matter most to you, where it comes out ahead.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Intel Xeon W 3335 and Intel Core Ultra 9 386H are closely matched

Intel Xeon W 3335

Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

Where Intel Xeon W 3335 stands out

Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 250 W (900% more)
Core Specifications Threads: 32
Core Specifications L3 Cache: 24 MB (33% more)

Where Intel Core Ultra 9 386H stands out

Core Specifications L1 Cache: 1,600 KB (25% more)
Core Specifications Maximum Frequency: 4.9 GHz (23% more)
Core Specifications L2 Cache: 24 MB (20% more)

Winner by category for Intel Xeon W 3335 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
Category	Intel Xeon W 3335	Intel Core Ultra 9 386H	Winner
Core Specifications	57	63	Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
Integrated Graphics	0	44	Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
Benchmark	70	65	Intel Xeon W 3335

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Sep 2026.

Intel Xeon W 3335

The provided source is a comprehensive list of Intel Xeon processors categorized by generation. It tracks the evolution of various processor lines, but it does not provide specific details for the Intel Xeon W 3335 model.

Cons

No specifications or data available for this specific model in the provided source.

Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

The Intel Core Ultra 9 386H is a high-performance mobile processor designed for premium, power-oriented laptop computers. Featuring a robust PassMark CPU Mark score of 44,000, this system-on-chip is engineered to handle demanding computational workloads and heavy multitasking on the go.

Best for Intense multi-threaded workflows such as video rendering, 3D compilation, and…Best for Premium gaming laptops and high-end mobile workstations

Pros

Delivers exceptional multi-threaded performance, validated by a PassMark score of 44,000
Tailored for high-end portable computing setups requiring desktop-class processing power

Cons

High performance potential typically results in increased thermal output and elevated power consumption under load

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Xeon W 3335

Check Price on Amazon

Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Xeon W 333539,293

Intel Core Ultra 9 386H36,183

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	Intel Xeon W 3335	Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
Cores	16	16
Threads	32	16
Base Frequency	3.4 GHz	N/A
Base Power Consumption	250 W900% more	25 W
Maximum Frequency	4 GHz	4.9 GHz23% more
Maximum Power Consumption	N/A	80 W
L1 Cache	1,280 KB	1,600 KB25% more
L2 Cache	20 MB	24 MB20% more
L3 Cache	24 MB33% more	18 MB
Lithography Process	10 nm	N/A
Is unlocked	No	N/A

Integrated Graphics

Feature	Intel Xeon W 3335	Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
Model	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	Intel Xeon W 3335	Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
PassMark CPU Mark	39,2939% more	36,183

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Xeon W 3335 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 386H comparison

They are closely matched: Intel Xeon W 3335 scores 69/100 and Intel Core Ultra 9 386H scores 68/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 point. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.

Intel Xeon W 3335 and Intel Core Ultra 9 386H are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 69/100 for Intel Xeon W 3335 and 68/100 for Intel Core Ultra 9 386H.

It's close — Intel Xeon W 3335 (69/100) and Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (68/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.