Intel Core Ultra X7 368H vs Intel Xeon D 2799

Updated Sep 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the Intel Xeon D 2799 is the better pick — it scores 64/100 to the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H's 61, leading on Core Specifications. Choose the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H instead if integrated graphics matters most to you, where it comes out ahead.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • Intel Xeon D 2799 and Intel Core Ultra X7 368H are closely matched overall (within 3 points).
  • Intel Xeon D 2799 stands out on Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 129 W (416% more), Core Specifications L3 Cache: 30 MB (67% more), Core Specifications Cores: 20.
  • Intel Core Ultra X7 368H counters with Core Specifications Maximum Frequency: 5 GHz (47% more).
Intel Xeon D 2799 and Intel Core Ultra X7 368H are closely matched
Intel Xeon D 2799
64
Intel Core Ultra X7 368H
61
Where Intel Xeon D 2799 stands out
  • Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 129 W (416% more)
  • Core Specifications L3 Cache: 30 MB (67% more)
  • Core Specifications Cores: 20
Where Intel Core Ultra X7 368H stands out
  • Core Specifications Maximum Frequency: 5 GHz (47% more)

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Sep 2026.

Intel Core Ultra X7 368H

The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H is a high-performance mobile processor designed to handle demanding computing workloads. With a PassMark CPU Mark score of 37500, this chip is built for users requiring substantial processing power in portable form factors.

Best for Resource-heavy applications and demanding multitasking workloads
Pros
  • Strong multi-threaded performance with a PassMark score of 37500
  • Capable of handling intensive productivity and creative tasks
Cons
  • Limited official specifications and architectural details are currently available beyond initial benchmark data

Intel Xeon D 2799

The Intel Xeon D 2799 is listed in the index of Intel Xeon processors, specifically within the Broadwell-based subsection. It belongs to a series designed for various computing needs.

Best for Broadwell based systems
Pros
  • Is part of the list of Xeon D processors (Source 1)

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Core Ultra X7 368H

Intel Xeon D 2799

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Core Ultra X7 368H33,547
Intel Xeon D 279933,792

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Core Ultra X7 368H vs Intel Xeon D 2799 comparison

They are closely matched: Intel Core Ultra X7 368H scores 67/100 and Intel Xeon D 2799 scores 66/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 point. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
Intel Core Ultra X7 368H and Intel Xeon D 2799 are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 67/100 for Intel Core Ultra X7 368H and 66/100 for Intel Xeon D 2799.
It's close — Intel Core Ultra X7 368H (67/100) and Intel Xeon D 2799 (66/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote