Intel Xeon W 3375 vs Intel Core Ultra X9 388H

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the Intel Xeon W 3375 is the better pick — it scores 83/100 to the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H's 55, leading on Core Specifications and Benchmark. Choose the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H instead if integrated graphics matters most to you, where it comes out ahead.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Intel Xeon W 3375 leads overall

Intel Xeon W 3375

Intel Core Ultra X9 388H

Why it stands out

Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 270 W (980% more)
Core Specifications L3 Cache: 57 MB (217% more)
Core Specifications L2 Cache: 47.5 MB (98% more)

Winner by category for Intel Xeon W 3375 vs Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
Category	Intel Xeon W 3375	Intel Core Ultra X9 388H	Winner
Core Specifications	74	44	Intel Xeon W 3375
Integrated Graphics	0	56	Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
Benchmark	88	60	Intel Xeon W 3375

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

Intel Xeon W 3375

This document is a list documenting Intel Xeon microprocessors organized by generation. It details various models within different core-based architectures, including the 3000 series and 5000 series.

Best for Reference/ResearchBest for Comparison

Pros

The source provides an exhaustive chronological listing of numerous Xeon processors
Processors are categorized based on model lineages (e.g., E31x, X32x, X33x, E52xx)

Intel Core Ultra X9 388H

The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H is a high-performance mobile processor featuring 16 cores and 16 threads, designed for demanding laptop applications. It scales from a 25-watt base power consumption up to 80 watts maximum, pairing a 5.1 GHz maximum frequency with integrated Intel Arc B390 graphics.

Best for high-performance content creation laptopsBest for demanding mobile computing and gaming systems

Pros

High maximum frequency of 5.1 GHz for demanding workloads
Robust multi-core performance with 16 cores and 16 threads
Generous 24 MB L2 cache and 18 MB L3 cache configuration
Capable Intel Arc B390 integrated graphics

Cons

High power consumption scaling up to 80 watts under maximum load
May require robust laptop thermal solutions to maintain peak performance

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Xeon W 3375

Check Price on Amazon

Intel Core Ultra X9 388H

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Xeon W 337558,686

Intel Core Ultra X9 388H36,504

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	Intel Xeon W 3375	Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
Cores	38	16
Threads	76	16
Base Frequency	2.5 GHz19% more	2.1 GHz
Base Power Consumption	270 W980% more	25 W
Maximum Frequency	4 GHz	5.1 GHz27% more
Maximum Power Consumption	N/A	80 W
L1 Cache	3,040 KB90% more	1,600 KB
L2 Cache	47.5 MB98% more	24 MB
L3 Cache	57 MB217% more	18 MB
Lithography Process	10 nm	N/A
Is unlocked	No	N/A

Integrated Graphics

Feature	Intel Xeon W 3375	Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
Model	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	Intel Xeon W 3375	Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
PassMark CPU Mark	58,68661% more	36,504

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Xeon W 3375 vs Intel Core Ultra X9 388H comparison

Based on our overall comparison score, Intel Xeon W 3375 rates higher at 85/100 versus 69/100 for Intel Core Ultra X9 388H — a 16-point lead. Intel Xeon W 3375 is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.

Intel Xeon W 3375 and Intel Core Ultra X9 388H are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 85/100 for Intel Xeon W 3375 and 69/100 for Intel Core Ultra X9 388H.

If you want the higher-rated cpus option overall, Intel Xeon W 3375 (85/100) edges out Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (69/100). But if Intel Core Ultra X9 388H is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.