Intel Xeon E 2388G vs Intel Xeon W 1370P

Updated Jun 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the Intel Xeon E 2388G is the better pick — it scores 54/100 to the Intel Xeon W 1370P's 48, leading on Core Specifications. Choose the Intel Xeon W 1370P instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Intel Xeon E 2388G leads overall

Intel Xeon E 2388G

Intel Xeon W 1370P

Winner by category for Intel Xeon E 2388G vs Intel Xeon W 1370P
Category	Intel Xeon E 2388G	Intel Xeon W 1370P	Winner
Core Specifications	64	46	Intel Xeon E 2388G
Integrated Graphics	29	29	Tie
Benchmark	52	52	Tie

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jun 2026.

Intel Xeon E 2388G

This source provides a comprehensive list of Intel Xeon microprocessors, categorized by their architectural generation. It documents the evolution and lineage of processors intended for server and workstation use.

Best for researchBest for historical tracking

Pros

The resource lists thousands of historical and modern Xeon models across different generations (P6-based through Granite Rapids)
Processors are organized logically, allowing users to track changes in core technology like NetBurst, Core, and various current architectures.

Cons

The information is presented as a list of historical data rather than detailed product specifications for any single chip.
It requires navigating multiple sections to find modern processor details.

Intel Xeon W 1370P

The Intel Xeon W processor line includes various generations for workstations. The listed type represents a model available in the overall series of Intel Xeon microprocessors.

Best for workstations

Pros

As part of the comprehensive list of Intel Xeon processors by generation
Representing models that appeared across different core-based architectures over time

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Xeon E 2388G

Check Price on Amazon

Intel Xeon W 1370P

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Xeon E 2388G23,458

Intel Xeon W 1370P23,311

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Review Videos

Hand-picked expert reviews for each product

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	Intel Xeon E 2388G	Intel Xeon W 1370P
Cores	8	8
Threads	16	16
Base Frequency	3.2 GHz	3.6 GHz12% more
Base Power Consumption	95 W	125 W32% more
Maximum Frequency	5.1 GHz	5.2 GHz
Maximum Power Consumption	N/A	N/A
L1 Cache	640 KB	N/A
L2 Cache	4 MB	N/A
L3 Cache	16 MB	16 MB
Lithography Process	14 nm	14 nm
Is unlocked	No	No

Integrated Graphics

Feature	Intel Xeon E 2388G	Intel Xeon W 1370P
Model

Benchmark

Feature	Intel Xeon E 2388G	Intel Xeon W 1370P
PassMark CPU Mark	23,458	23,311

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Xeon E 2388G vs Intel Xeon W 1370P comparison

They are closely matched: Intel Xeon E 2388G scores 45/100 and Intel Xeon W 1370P scores 45/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 points. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.

Intel Xeon E 2388G and Intel Xeon W 1370P are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 45/100 for Intel Xeon E 2388G and 45/100 for Intel Xeon W 1370P.

It's close — Intel Xeon E 2388G (45/100) and Intel Xeon W 1370P (45/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.