Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C vs Intel Xeon W 3365

Updated Jun 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the Intel Xeon W 3365 is the better pick — it scores 75/100 to the Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C's 65, leading on Benchmark. Choose the Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C instead if core specifications matters most to you, where it comes out ahead.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Intel Xeon W 3365 leads overall

Intel Xeon W 3365

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C

Why it stands out

Core Specifications Maximum Frequency: 4 GHz (14% more)

Winner by category for Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C vs Intel Xeon W 3365
Category	Intel Xeon W 3365	Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C	Winner
Core Specifications	41	55	Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C
Integrated Graphics	0	0	Tie
Benchmark	92	70	Intel Xeon W 3365

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jun 2026.

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C

This is an Intel Xeon processor part of the Ice Lake-based series, utilizing a dual-processor socket design. The specific model number was not available in the provided sources.

Intel Xeon W 3365

This is a listing of Intel Xeon processors, cataloging models by their generation and architecture (Source 1). The list serves as a comprehensive resource detailing various Xeon lines for system builders and researchers needing historical product information.

Best for reference buildingBest for historical tech review

Pros

Provides a chronological overview of different processor generations
Classifies processors by core-based versus NetBurst-based architectures
Details numerous models across several architectural eras (e.g., P6, Core, Nehalem)

Cons

The source is purely a massive list and does not offer detailed specifications for any single product
Only listing the inclusion of model names and their processor generation/architecture

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C

Check Price on Amazon

Intel Xeon W 3365

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C56,202

Intel Xeon W 336557,312

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C	Intel Xeon W 3365
Cores	32	32
Threads	64	64
Base Frequency	2.9 GHz7% more	2.7 GHz
Base Power Consumption	300 W11% more	270 W
Maximum Frequency	3.5 GHz	4 GHz14% more
Maximum Power Consumption	N/A	N/A
L1 Cache	2,560 KB	2,560 KB
L2 Cache	40 MB	40 MB
L3 Cache	54 MB13% more	48 MB
Lithography Process	10 nm	10 nm
Is unlocked	No	No

Integrated Graphics

Feature	Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C	Intel Xeon W 3365
Model	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C	Intel Xeon W 3365
PassMark CPU Mark	56,202	57,312

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C vs Intel Xeon W 3365 comparison

They are closely matched: Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C scores 83/100 and Intel Xeon W 3365 scores 83/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 points. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C and Intel Xeon W 3365 are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 83/100 for Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C and 83/100 for Intel Xeon W 3365.

It's close — Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C (83/100) and Intel Xeon W 3365 (83/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.