Intel Arc 140T vs AMD Radeon 680M

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the Intel Arc 140T is the better pick — it scores 34/100 to the AMD Radeon 680M's 29, leading on Core Specifications and API Support. Choose the AMD Radeon 680M instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • Intel Arc 140T leads AMD Radeon 680M overall by 5 points (34 vs 29 out of 100).
  • Intel Arc 140T stands out on Benchmark G3D Mark: 6,576 (64% more), Theoretical Performance Performance (FP32): 4.813 TFLOPS (42% more), Core Specifications Lithography Process: 5 nm (17% less).
Intel Arc 140T leads overall
Intel Arc 140T
34
AMD Radeon 680M
29
Why it stands out
  • Benchmark G3D Mark: 6,576 (64% more)
  • Theoretical Performance Performance (FP32): 4.813 TFLOPS (42% more)
  • Core Specifications Lithography Process: 5 nm (17% less)

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

Intel Arc 140T

The Intel Arc 140T is an integrated graphics solution built for compact PCs and mobile devices. Operating at a maximum frequency of 2.35 GHz, it utilizes shared system memory and provides support for DirectX 12. Achieving a G3D Mark score of 6576, it delivers baseline 3D graphics performance for everyday tasks and lightweight gaming without requiring a discrete graphics card.

Best for Casual gaming and lightweight 3D rendering on integrated platformsBest for Compact PC builds needing basic DirectX 12 graphics acceleration
Pros
  • Reaches a peak clock frequency of 2.35 GHz
  • Full support for DirectX 12 API applications
  • Integrated form factor allows for power-efficient, space-saving system builds
Cons
  • Relies entirely on shared memory rather than high-speed dedicated VRAM
  • Modest 3D benchmark performance limits capability in demanding AAA games

AMD Radeon 680M

The AMD Radeon 680M is an integrated graphics processor engineered for mobile laptops and handheld devices powered by AMD Ryzen processors. Designed to handle light gaming and daily multimedia tasks without the added bulk of a dedicated graphics card, it offers a balance of energy efficiency and entry-level 3D graphics performance. It targets users seeking lightweight laptops or portable gaming devices with decent graphical capabilities.

Best for Lightweight laptops prioritized for portability and casual 1080p gamingBest for Handheld gaming PCs requiring power-efficient integrated graphics
Pros
  • Integrated architecture reduces total device power consumption and heat output
  • Delivers entry-level 1080p gaming capabilities without requiring a discrete GPU
  • Enables compact and ultraportable laptop designs
Cons
  • Graphics performance is constrained compared to standalone dedicated GPUs
  • Relies on shared system memory, which can limit bandwidth

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Arc 140T

AMD Radeon 680M

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Arc 140T6,576
AMD Radeon 680M4,016

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Arc 140T vs AMD Radeon 680M comparison

They are closely matched: Intel Arc 140T scores 26/100 and AMD Radeon 680M scores 24/100 in our overall comparison — within 2 points. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
Intel Arc 140T and AMD Radeon 680M are compared side by side above across every spec in the gpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 26/100 for Intel Arc 140T and 24/100 for AMD Radeon 680M.
It's close — Intel Arc 140T (26/100) and AMD Radeon 680M (24/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote