AMD Radeon 680M vs Intel Graphics

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the AMD Radeon 680M is the better pick — it scores 42/100 to the Intel Graphics's 26, leading on Core Specifications and API Support. Choose the Intel Graphics instead if memory matters most to you, where it comes out ahead.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

AMD Radeon 680M leads overall

AMD Radeon 680M

Intel Graphics

Why it stands out

Theoretical Performance Performance (FP32): 3.379 TFLOPS (705% more)
Benchmark G3D Mark: 4,016 (23% more)

Winner by category for AMD Radeon 680M vs Intel Graphics
Category	AMD Radeon 680M	Intel Graphics	Winner
Core Specifications	100	0	AMD Radeon 680M
Memory	56	71	Intel Graphics
API Support	100	0	AMD Radeon 680M
Theoretical Performance	55	26	AMD Radeon 680M
Benchmark	18	12	AMD Radeon 680M
Miscellaneous	32	32	Tie

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

AMD Radeon 680M

The AMD Radeon 680M is an integrated graphics processor engineered for mobile laptops and handheld devices powered by AMD Ryzen processors. Designed to handle light gaming and daily multimedia tasks without the added bulk of a dedicated graphics card, it offers a balance of energy efficiency and entry-level 3D graphics performance. It targets users seeking lightweight laptops or portable gaming devices with decent graphical capabilities.

Best for Lightweight laptops prioritized for portability and casual 1080p gamingBest for Handheld gaming PCs requiring power-efficient integrated graphics

Pros

Integrated architecture reduces total device power consumption and heat output
Delivers entry-level 1080p gaming capabilities without requiring a discrete GPU
Enables compact and ultraportable laptop designs

Cons

Graphics performance is constrained compared to standalone dedicated GPUs
Relies on shared system memory, which can limit bandwidth

Intel Graphics

Intel Graphics Technology refers to the integrated graphics processor (IGP) series embedded directly within Intel CPU packages, ranging from early HD Graphics to modern Xe2-based integrated Arc GPUs found in processors like Lunar Lake (130V and 140V). Designed for laptops and desktops, these solutions handle daily visual tasks, multi-monitor displays, and media processing without requiring a standalone graphics card. Modern implementations use architectures such as Xe-LPG and Xe2, manufactured by Intel and TSMC, to power integrated graphics across Intel Core and Core Ultra lineups.

Best for Energy-efficient video playback and media encoding on thin-and-light laptops.Best for Everyday productivity and multi-display office desktop configurations without a

Pros

Integrated directly into CPU packages, saving power and space in compact laptop designs.
Includes dedicated hardware acceleration like Intel Quick Sync Video for efficient video encoding and decoding.
Evolving Xe and Xe2 architectures bring higher execution unit counts and improved 3D graphics capabilities compared to older integrated solutions.

Cons

Shares system memory and power limits with the CPU, restricting gaming and heavy rendering performance compared to dedicated graphics cards.
Graphics performance and API feature support vary significantly across different CPU generations and tier levels.

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

AMD Radeon 680M

Check Price on Amazon

Intel Graphics

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

AMD Radeon 680M4,016

Intel Graphics3,260

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	AMD Radeon 680M	Intel Graphics
Base Frequency	N/A	N/A
Maximum Frequency	2.4 GHz	N/A
Lithography Process	6 nm	N/A

Memory

Feature	AMD Radeon 680M	Intel Graphics
Technology
Bus Width	N/A	N/A
Bandwidth	N/A	42 GB/s
Is Shared	Yes	Yes

API Support

Feature	AMD Radeon 680M	Intel Graphics
DirectX Version	12	N/A
OpenGL Version	N/A	N/A
Vulkan Version	1.3	N/A
OpenCL Version	N/A	N/A

Theoretical Performance

Feature	AMD Radeon 680M	Intel Graphics
Pixel Rate	N/A	N/A
Texture Rate	N/A	N/A
Performance (FP16)	6.758 TFLOPS	N/A
Performance (FP32)	3.379 TFLOPS705% more	0.42 TFLOPS
Performance (FP64)	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	AMD Radeon 680M	Intel Graphics
G3D Mark	4,01623% more	3,260

Miscellaneous

Feature	AMD Radeon 680M	Intel Graphics
Release Date	January 4, 2022	N/A
Platform

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AMD Radeon 680M vs Intel Graphics comparison

Based on our overall comparison score, AMD Radeon 680M rates higher at 24/100 versus 20/100 for Intel Graphics — a 4-point lead. AMD Radeon 680M is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.

AMD Radeon 680M and Intel Graphics are compared side by side above across every spec in the gpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 24/100 for AMD Radeon 680M and 20/100 for Intel Graphics.

If you want the higher-rated gpus option overall, AMD Radeon 680M (24/100) edges out Intel Graphics (20/100). But if Intel Graphics is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.