AMD Radeon 760M vs Intel Arc 140T

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

The AMD Radeon 760M and Intel Arc 140T are closely matched at 33 and 32/100. The AMD Radeon 760M edges ahead on Core Specifications and Theoretical Performance, while the Intel Arc 140T leads on Benchmark — pick the one whose strengths match what you'll actually use.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • AMD Radeon 760M and Intel Arc 140T are closely matched overall (within 1 point).
  • AMD Radeon 760M stands out on Core Specifications Lithography Process: 4 nm (20% less), Theoretical Performance Performance (FP32): 5.325 TFLOPS (11% more).
  • Intel Arc 140T counters with Benchmark G3D Mark: 6,576 (24% more).
AMD Radeon 760M and Intel Arc 140T are closely matched
AMD Radeon 760M
33
Intel Arc 140T
32
Where AMD Radeon 760M stands out
  • Core Specifications Lithography Process: 4 nm (20% less)
  • Theoretical Performance Performance (FP32): 5.325 TFLOPS (11% more)
Where Intel Arc 140T stands out
  • Benchmark G3D Mark: 6,576 (24% more)

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

AMD Radeon 760M

The AMD Radeon 760M is an integrated graphics processor built for mainstream mobile computing platforms and compact laptops. Operating directly within the host APU without dedicated video memory, it caters to users needing power-efficient performance for routine office tasks, video playback, and entry-level gaming.

Best for Everyday productivity and high-definition video streamingBest for Casual gaming on ultra-portable laptops
Pros
  • Lower power consumption compared to standalone discrete graphics cards
  • Allows for thinner and lighter laptop chassis designs
  • Sufficient graphical performance for light gaming and multimedia tasks
Cons
  • Shares system RAM rather than utilizing dedicated video memory
  • Struggles with demanding modern AAA gaming titles at high settings

Intel Arc 140T

The Intel Arc 140T is an integrated graphics solution built for compact PCs and mobile devices. Operating at a maximum frequency of 2.35 GHz, it utilizes shared system memory and provides support for DirectX 12. Achieving a G3D Mark score of 6576, it delivers baseline 3D graphics performance for everyday tasks and lightweight gaming without requiring a discrete graphics card.

Best for Casual gaming and lightweight 3D rendering on integrated platformsBest for Compact PC builds needing basic DirectX 12 graphics acceleration
Pros
  • Reaches a peak clock frequency of 2.35 GHz
  • Full support for DirectX 12 API applications
  • Integrated form factor allows for power-efficient, space-saving system builds
Cons
  • Relies entirely on shared memory rather than high-speed dedicated VRAM
  • Modest 3D benchmark performance limits capability in demanding AAA games

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

AMD Radeon 760M

Intel Arc 140T

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

AMD Radeon 760M5,290
Intel Arc 140T6,576

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AMD Radeon 760M vs Intel Arc 140T comparison

They are closely matched: AMD Radeon 760M scores 27/100 and Intel Arc 140T scores 26/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 point. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
AMD Radeon 760M and Intel Arc 140T are compared side by side above across every spec in the gpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 27/100 for AMD Radeon 760M and 26/100 for Intel Arc 140T.
It's close — AMD Radeon 760M (27/100) and Intel Arc 140T (26/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote