AMD Radeon 780M vs Apple M1 GPU

Updated Sep 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the AMD Radeon 780M is the better pick — it scores 45/100 to the Apple M1 GPU's 34, leading on Core Specifications and API Support. Choose the Apple M1 GPU instead if memory matters most to you, where it comes out ahead.

  • Apple M1 GPU has no published G3D Mark result, so it scores lower.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • AMD Radeon 780M leads Apple M1 GPU overall by 11 points (45 vs 34 out of 100).
  • AMD Radeon 780M stands out on Theoretical Performance Performance (FP32): 8.294 TFLOPS (219% more), Core Specifications Lithography Process: 4 nm (20% less).
AMD Radeon 780M leads overall
AMD Radeon 780M
45
Apple M1 GPU
34
Why it stands out
  • Theoretical Performance Performance (FP32): 8.294 TFLOPS (219% more)
  • Core Specifications Lithography Process: 4 nm (20% less)

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Sep 2026.

AMD Radeon 780M

The AMD Radeon 780M is an integrated graphics solution designed to deliver capable multimedia and entry-level gaming performance within mobile processors. Featuring a G3D Mark benchmark score of 8000, it is engineered for thin-and-light laptops and portable gaming handhelds that require a balance of energy efficiency and graphical power.

Best for Light to moderate gaming on thin-and-light laptopsBest for Efficient power management in compact portable gaming handhelds
Pros
  • Delivers strong integrated graphics performance with a G3D Mark score of 8000
  • Allows for slimmer, more power-efficient laptop designs by removing the need for a discrete GPU
Cons
  • Lacks dedicated video memory (VRAM), relying on shared system memory instead
  • Real-world performance is heavily dependent on the host system's RAM speeds and thermal design

Apple M1 GPU

The Apple M1 is a series of ARM-based systems-on-a-chip that features an integrated GPU ranging from 7 to 64 cores depending on the specific chip tier. Manufactured using TSMC's 5 nm process, this hardware integrates the graphics processor, CPU, and system memory onto a single die. It is designed to deliver energy-efficient graphics performance across Apple's laptops, compact desktops, and high-end tablets.

Best for Portable creative work such as video and photo editing on laptops and tablets…Best for Silent or fanless computing configurations that require modest graphical…
Pros
  • Unified memory architecture allows the GPU and CPU to share the same high-speed memory pool directly.
  • Scalable graphics performance options ranging from 7-core and 8-core designs in entry-level models to 64-core configurations in workstation chips.
  • Built on an efficient 5 nm process node that delivers high graphics throughput relative to its power consumption.
Cons
  • The integrated design prevents post-purchase graphics or memory upgrades.
  • Base configurations are restricted to a maximum of 8 or 12 GB of unified memory shared between the CPU and GPU.

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AMD Radeon 780M vs Apple M1 GPU comparison

They are closely matched: AMD Radeon 780M scores 29/100 and Apple M1 GPU scores 29/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 points. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
AMD Radeon 780M and Apple M1 GPU are compared side by side above across every spec in the gpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 29/100 for AMD Radeon 780M and 29/100 for Apple M1 GPU.
It's close — AMD Radeon 780M (29/100) and Apple M1 GPU (29/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote