Apple M2 Max GPU vs AMD Radeon 890M

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the AMD Radeon 890M is the better pick — it scores 48/100 to the Apple M2 Max GPU's 39, leading on Core Specifications and API Support. Choose the Apple M2 Max GPU instead if memory matters most to you, where it comes out ahead.

  • Apple M2 Max GPU has no published G3D Mark result, so it scores lower.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • AMD Radeon 890M leads Apple M2 Max GPU overall by 9 points (48 vs 39 out of 100).
  • AMD Radeon 890M stands out on Core Specifications Lithography Process: 4 nm (20% less).
AMD Radeon 890M leads overall
AMD Radeon 890M
48
Apple M2 Max GPU
39
Why it stands out
  • Core Specifications Lithography Process: 4 nm (20% less)

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

Apple M2 Max GPU

The Apple M2 Max GPU is a high-performance integrated graphics processor built into the M2 Max system-on-a-chip, designed primarily for power-user notebooks and compact desktops. It features up to 38 GPU cores and delivers up to 13.6 TFLOPS of FP32 floating-point performance. Utilizing a unified design, it shares high-speed LPDDR5 system memory directly across the system to handle demanding visual workloads.

Best for On-the-go high-resolution video rendering and color gradingBest for Mobile 3D asset creation and complex visual effects work
Pros
  • Delivers high-end graphics performance with up to 38 GPU cores and 4864 arithmetic logic units
  • Provides up to 13.6 TFLOPS of single-precision floating-point capability
  • Features a dedicated 48 MB last-level cache to streamline data transfer and reduce latency
  • Leverages efficient unified memory access to eliminate traditional bottlenecks between CPU and graphics
Cons
  • Integrated system-on-a-package design prevents any post-purchase upgrades to GPU cores or memory
  • Provides lower performance limits than the desktop-focused M2 Ultra, which doubles the graphics hardware

AMD Radeon 890M

The AMD Radeon 890M is an integrated mobile graphics solution built on an efficient 4-nanometer manufacturing process. Designed for thin-and-light laptops, it operates at boost frequencies up to 2.9 GHz and supports modern graphics APIs like DirectX 12. Because it operates as an integrated processor, it relies on shared system memory rather than dedicated VRAM.

Best for Light mainstream gaming and video playback on thin-and-light laptopsBest for Power-conscious mobile computing where a dedicated graphics card is unnecessary
Pros
  • Efficient 4nm manufacturing process helps optimize power consumption in mobile devices
  • High maximum boost frequency of 2.9 GHz for an integrated GPU
  • Full DirectX 12 support for modern software and light gaming compatibility
Cons
  • Lacks dedicated VRAM and must share memory bandwidth with the system RAM
  • Graphics performance remains inherently limited compared to modern discrete GPUs

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Apple M2 Max GPU

AMD Radeon 890M

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Apple M2 Max GPU vs AMD Radeon 890M comparison

They are closely matched: Apple M2 Max GPU scores 38/100 and AMD Radeon 890M scores 36/100 in our overall comparison — within 2 points. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
Apple M2 Max GPU and AMD Radeon 890M are compared side by side above across every spec in the gpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 38/100 for Apple M2 Max GPU and 36/100 for AMD Radeon 890M.
It's close — Apple M2 Max GPU (38/100) and AMD Radeon 890M (36/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote