Apple M4 Pro GPU vs AMD Radeon 890M

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the AMD Radeon 890M is the better pick — it scores 44/100 to the Apple M4 Pro GPU's 39, leading on API Support and Theoretical Performance. Choose the Apple M4 Pro GPU instead if core specifications and memory matter most to you, where it comes out ahead.

  • Apple M4 Pro GPU has no published G3D Mark result, so it scores lower.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • AMD Radeon 890M leads Apple M4 Pro GPU overall by 5 points (44 vs 39 out of 100).
  • AMD Radeon 890M stands out on Theoretical Performance Performance (FP16): 23.757 TFLOPS (40% more), Theoretical Performance Performance (FP32): 11.878 TFLOPS (40% more), API Support Vulkan Version: 1.4 (17% more).
AMD Radeon 890M leads overall
AMD Radeon 890M
44
Apple M4 Pro GPU
39
Why it stands out
  • Theoretical Performance Performance (FP16): 23.757 TFLOPS (40% more)
  • Theoretical Performance Performance (FP32): 11.878 TFLOPS (40% more)
  • API Support Vulkan Version: 1.4 (17% more)

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

Apple M4 Pro GPU

The Apple M4 Pro GPU is an integrated mobile graphics processor built on an advanced 3-nanometer lithography process. Released in late 2024, it is engineered for power-efficient performance, delivering up to 17 TFLOPS of half-precision compute capability alongside 24 GB of shared unified memory.

Best for Mobile creative tasks requiring high-bandwidth unified memoryBest for Power-restricted setups demanding high graphical efficiency on a mobile…
Pros
  • Efficient power envelope with a maximum draw of 45 watts
  • High-speed memory architecture with 273 GB/s of bandwidth and a 256-bit bus width
  • Strong FP16 computational performance suitable for modern machine learning and rendering pipelines
Cons
  • Uses shared system memory rather than dedicated, standalone graphics memory
  • Offers older API compatibility standards, supporting OpenGL 4.1 and Vulkan 1.2

AMD Radeon 890M

The AMD Radeon 890M is an integrated mobile graphics solution built on an efficient 4-nanometer manufacturing process. Designed for thin-and-light laptops, it operates at boost frequencies up to 2.9 GHz and supports modern graphics APIs like DirectX 12. Because it operates as an integrated processor, it relies on shared system memory rather than dedicated VRAM.

Best for Light mainstream gaming and video playback on thin-and-light laptopsBest for Power-conscious mobile computing where a dedicated graphics card is unnecessary
Pros
  • Efficient 4nm manufacturing process helps optimize power consumption in mobile devices
  • High maximum boost frequency of 2.9 GHz for an integrated GPU
  • Full DirectX 12 support for modern software and light gaming compatibility
Cons
  • Lacks dedicated VRAM and must share memory bandwidth with the system RAM
  • Graphics performance remains inherently limited compared to modern discrete GPUs

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Apple M4 Pro GPU

AMD Radeon 890M

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Apple M4 Pro GPU vs AMD Radeon 890M comparison

They are closely matched: Apple M4 Pro GPU scores 37/100 and AMD Radeon 890M scores 36/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 point. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
Apple M4 Pro GPU and AMD Radeon 890M are compared side by side above across every spec in the gpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 37/100 for Apple M4 Pro GPU and 36/100 for AMD Radeon 890M.
It's close — Apple M4 Pro GPU (37/100) and AMD Radeon 890M (36/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote